Transcript
Full text
In the aftermath of the 2024 election, America is even more divided than before. Half the country fears the end of democracy and the other half welcomes it. As America inches toward the brink of authoritarian rule, now more than ever, we must force ourselves to have the necessary conversation. Welcome to the necessary conversation. I'm Chad Kultgen and today it's me solo with my parents. My sister is celebrating her birthday. She is gallivanting, wouldn't you say? >> She is and I spoke with her um 30 minutes ago and she will be galli- gallivanting most of the evening, so she will not be on the live tonight. >> Okay. Well, I will be. Mom, will you be on the live? >> Of course. >> All right. So, live tonight, 6:00 p.m. PST. My mom and I will be live answering questions about the show you're about to listen to and or watch right now. Today, we have a lot of topics. We've got Trump's war entering its seventh week. We've got allegations against Eric Swalwell. We have got uh Melania's weird press conference. That one was a a doozy. We've got Trump going insane. We have got a I'm going to read that entire 480-word tweet. >> Oh my gosh. >> He wrote it. I'm going to read it. >> I know. >> Trump also posted a video of a woman being brutally murdered with a hammer to his Truth Social and we have Hegseth caught lying about how the war is going and the people who caught him are US military members. So, before we begin all of that, Mom, do you have ditties? >> Yes, I probably could have made this a topic cuz I got way too much information on it, but I'll do it real quick. Um the 10-day lunar mission. Uh they came back. They splashed down. Thank God. It was the first mission in 50 years for us to go around and boomerang the moon. Uh, the Canadian astronaut, Jeremy Hansen said, "We are a mirror reflecting you." Talking about us. >> Mhm. >> "If you like what you see, look a little bit deeper because this is you." Um, the other guy said, "Thank God." Um, again, seeing what we saw, doing what we did, being who we were, "It's too big for just one body. It's just way too big." >> Mhm. >> So, do you know what? They they said a lot of cool things once they got back and were being interviewed. Do you know what the overview effect is, Bob or Chad? >> No. >> No. >> Explain it. >> Okay. The overview effect is it was coined in 1987 by the author Frank White. It is a profound connection. It's a psychological shift in awareness reported by astronauts when they have viewed the Earth from space. It's a um, like they feel, I guess more holy, more awareness that we're really nothing once they see the Earth from where they're at and viewing it. Um, like they are connected better now to humanity, to kindness. Um, and >> As soon as you said that, Dad is looking out the window. >> No, something something hit the window. >> Yeah. >> Who knows what that is? But, like to act more kindly, to >> Yeah. >> Yeah, they said a lot of cool things when they got back and >> um, essay written by the late Carl Sagan called the pale blue dot. >> going to say, the blue dot. Uh-huh, the same thing. And they're not the only astronauts to have spoke like this. The ones in the past, um, Um, all kinds of >> do you take from that, Mom? >> What I take from this is maybe we need to send Trump and the president of Iran up there for a while. That's what I took from it. >> they need to learn the lesson that we shouldn't be fighting wars because we're all one thing. We are all planet Earth. We are all here. As Carl Sagan said, it is the only home we have ever known. It's >> Right. >> Oh, I forget exactly. I can't quote it verbatim. Certain parts of it I can, but there's a big part in there where he talks about countless rivers of blood have been shed in the name of countries and kings. For what? You know, something along those lines. Then it's like we're we're killing each other for no reason. >> I'm not laughing about that. >> these leaders are insane. That is what the meaning of that is though. >> I know. I was laughing about your accent. >> That was my Carl Sagan. Thank you. >> And then they were the only astronauts ever to be like uh to be able to see on the far side of the moon. >> Yeah. >> And when they came around there, I mean, if you have not seen the clip, it made me tear up. Reid Wiseman, the commander, um he's he also said it's a special thing to be a human and it's a special thing to be on planet Earth. Uh the commander Reid Wiseman, um it was I think it was his wife. Yes, his late wife passed in 2020 from cancer at the age of 46. They named a crater in her honor up there. Mhm. One of the craters on the moon is named Carol. >> Okay. >> C a r r o l l >> All right. >> That just touched me. >> Yeah. >> Now, would I ever go up in space? No. But it affects people. >> Of course. >> send Trump up there today and the president of Iran today. >> you can be affected by that understanding that we are a species living on this one thing, planet Earth, floating in the middle of space, a speck in the great darkness. You can understand that without going up there. >> Oh, yes. There needs to be more kindness in this world. It's going crazy. >> Right. And so, Trump is waging wars. Well, I mean, we'll get to it. Threatening to obliterate entire civilizations. >> No, entire species. >> Entire species. >> Okay. Humanity. He's going to kill humanity? >> No, he's going to kill the Iranians. >> Let's send Dad and Mom. >> is humans. >> Let's send Dad, Trump. >> Iranians. They're not human. >> Iranian president banned. Who else can we send up there? We'll send them all. >> know. We're moving on to the listener question. If you have >> that our whole number one topic. >> If you have a question, all you have to do is record it in a 1-minute or shorter video format, send it to the necessary conversation [email protected]. Here is our question today. >> Hey Necessary Pod. Question here for Bob and Mary Lou. So, I'm a dual citizen of the United States and a small country called the Seychelles Islands. It's a group of islands out in the Indian Ocean. And like a lot of other small countries, they've been extremely impacted by this war in Iran. Specifically, they're seeing oil shortages, goods shortages, and a huge drop in tourism, which is deeply impacting their economies. These countries did not ask for this war. They did not want this war, yet they've been impacted nonetheless. So, my question to you is, what would you say to these smaller nations who are being negatively impacted by the US and Iran's escalations and Israel's escalations? Uh and what would you say to them as they continue to develop potentially negative perceptions of the United States and other belligerents in this conflict? >> Okay. >> Well, me. >> Yeah. >> I just tell them get on board cuz Iran's going down. And all this brotherly love crap, it ain't got nothing to do with Iran. Iran will kill the world if we let them go. We need to put them down and under and all all your little countries that you're dual citizen with just need to get on board cuz it's going to happen. >> Mom? >> I say in time it's going to tell what's going to happen. I'm sorry that's happening to those countries. Does he live there or in the United States? Did I miss that one out? >> I He said he had dual citizenship. I believe he lives here, but I don't know. >> Lives there. Yeah. I don't I mean Yeah, I I feel bad for them. >> Well, if Iran wins, his countries will be crap anyway. >> But all right. Well, let's just get into it. Um thank you for your question. Again, if if anybody else out there has one, send it a video, 1 minute or shorter video to the necessary [email protected]. Our first topic this week is Trump's war week seven. Dad, you were wrong. Mom, you were wrong. >> I was closest though. I was on six. Dad was on four. >> All right. I'm only missed about a few weeks, but it's going to happen. >> Okay. >> But a few weeks of war, of people dying >> Yeah. >> is significant. >> We thought it would be >> Well, it's not significant enough. I want all the Iranians >> I know. >> dead. >> We thought it would be >> W- Dad, let me ask you why? >> Because they're going to kill the rest of us if we don't put them down. They're going to Well, >> the entire country? >> develop a nuclear weapon and they'll use it if we don't exterminate them. >> You think the entire society, you think a 1-year-old child would use a nuclear weapon against you? >> I've A- A- If they're Iranians, eventually that 1-year-old child will be 20 and yes, they will. >> You know, that is a good question. I have seen it I think it was on Instagram where they trained their little children to have a gun and they had American people standing there and trying to shoot them and kill them. I did see that, Chad. >> Okay. On Tuesday this week, Trump tweeted that Iran had an 8:00 p.m. Eastern deadline to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or quote a whole civilization will die tonight never to be brought back again threatening to commit war crimes by destroying Iran's bridges, power plants, and water treatment facilities. About 90 minutes before the deadline after Pakistan PM Shahbaz Sharif intervened, Trump announced a two-week ceasefire conditioned on Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz. The ceasefire was immediately broken when Israel bombed Lebanon killing hundreds of people. On Saturday, J.D. Vance led talks in Islamabad with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. After a 21-hour session, Vance announced, "The bad news is we have not reached an agreement. They have chosen not to accept our terms." citing Iran's refusal to commit to no nuclear weapons. As a result of Trump's war, Iran has taken control the previously free transit in the Strait of Hormuz, blocked most oil transit causing a historic oil supply shock. Iran now allows passage only with military coordination and Trump has slammed Iran for uh charging fees to tankers moving through the strait. US regular gas hit $4.14 a gallon Tuesday up 39% since the war began in February crossing $4 for the first time since 2022. This morning, Trump threatened once again to destroy the entire country of Iran claiming that uh he will block the Strait of Hormuz. And he also claimed that blocking the Strait of Hormuz is quote world extortion. Then he said, "I will block the Strait of Hormuz using US military vessels." Mom, if the entire purpose of the peace talks with J.D. Vance was to get the Strait of Hormuz opened again, why would Trump threaten to block it? >> I don't think that was the entire reason he went there. He went there um to be able to have peace between those two countries. I ran >> He went there to show that Iran's not going to negotiate with us. >> He wanted >> And the only way out of this is to kill him. >> He wanted a commitment from them that they're not going to do nuclear. >> And he got it. >> And he didn't get it. He's And they said no. >> He got what he went there for. War. >> Okay. >> I don't think anyone >> War or you said or oil? >> He said war. I don't think anyone expected one meeting >> He went there to escalate the war. >> I don't think anyone expected one meeting to have success. I was praying it would, but it sure did not. And then when Vance said, "Well, this is even though nothing occurred, it's better for us than it is for you." Meaning what Trump wants to do. And that's we're back to square one again. Um I heard that or I've read, not heard, that they Iran wants released billions of frozen assets. You think Trump's going to do that? >> He's already done it. He lifted sanctions on them so they could sell 15 billion dollars worth of oil. He already did it. >> But even they even want more, I think. >> Okay. >> I thought >> Sure, he'll do it. >> And they want security guarantees. >> Neither one of you are answering my question. >> What? >> If the goal here is to get the Strait of Hormuz open, >> Right. >> why would Trump threaten to block it himself? And it's already blocked. >> That's not the goal. You're the one that's misreading the goal. >> I Yeah. >> The goal The goal The goal is to exterminate Iran. So, if he shuts off all the oil coming out of that Strait of Hormuz, it's going to It's going to put Iran in the dirt. >> It's already shut off. Iran has shut it. >> They're making it more escalated. >> What's the deal with the mines in there? I heard or I would I say >> Hang on a minute. Hang on, Mom. The Strait of Hormuz is currently blocked. Iran now controls it. They are reportedly charging tolls for tankers to go through it. They're now making money off of it. And that used to be a free transit. >> my friend, is what's escalating the war. >> Was that as of this morning, Chad? >> is going to escalate until the point where Iran is completely annihilated. >> Okay. I You keep saying that. You're You're missing my entire question because you're just You're Yes, you're >> it. >> Okay. The question is >> is >> if we want that straight open so the oil can flow again, why would Trump threaten to block it? >> Because I think he's afraid there's bombs in there. >> They don't have any more money. He's trying to dry up their finances. >> There's mines in there that they want to blow us up or something. >> Dad, you said he's trying to dry up their finances, but he lifted sanctions allowing them to make 15 billion dollars off of oil sales. >> Yeah, so what? That's why he lifted sanctions, but they'll never see any of that money. >> Chad, may I ask you >> the money. I don't know what you're talking about. >> They Well, they're not going to be able to use it. >> Chad, may I ask >> Cuz they're all going to They're all going to They're all going to die. >> He's going to have a lot of interruptions this week. Chad, may I ask you, where are you going with this? I really don't understand what you're trying to say. >> I'm saying overtly >> Yes. >> has no [ __ ] idea what he's doing. He's He goes into this war. At first, the goal was regime >> Jesus Christ. >> Just listen to what I'm saying, Dad. >> Okay. Listen. >> I'm listening to it, but it's a bunch of garbage. >> Okay. Then I'll ask you some questions and you can say yes or no. >> Okay. >> When we first went into this war, did Trump say the goal was to change the regime? >> Yes. >> Yes. >> Okay. Then, did he switch that goal? >> on we're on regime number four? >> Okay, go ahead. >> Since he said that? Yes. >> It's the same regime. >> No, it's not. >> Yeah, it is. They just promoted the guy >> talking about? You're wrong. >> We've taken down some people. >> You're wrong. The first three regimes are all dead. >> No, the son of the guy who led the first one is now leading it. >> Okay. >> No, they're not. You're wrong. Who leads it then? >> You're wrong. >> Who's the leader of the current regime? >> I don't even know. >> [ __ ] who knows? >> Okay. >> They don't >> my case on that. >> Okay. >> So, he said the first goal was regime change. >> Right. >> And he said we achieved that goal. Dad, you yourself would say that there have been four regimes, so we've achieved that goal. Why are we still there? >> Right. >> Dad? >> The last regime's got to get killed. >> Okay, so not regime change then isn't the goal. Complete extermination is the goal? >> That's right. >> Okay, but he said it was regime change. >> Right. >> Right. >> to the meeting with Vance? Who was there with Vance from Iran? >> Jared Kushner? >> No, I know on our side. On their side, who do they bring? >> I'm not sure who's negotiating for them. >> I'm not sure either. >> It's cuz he doesn't exist. >> No, he There was someone representing >> he represents Iran, but he's not a regime leader. >> Let me ask you this question. Do you think it's okay for a US president to threaten to commit war crimes and destroy entire civilizations? >> In the case of Iran, absolutely. >> I don't. No. >> Okay, so Mom, you disagree with Trump there. >> Yes, I don't think he should go blow everything up. There's innocent people there. It's not right. a war crime. >> They're not innocent. >> If he destroys civilian infrastructure, that is a war crime. >> Right, some are innocent, for sure. >> going to commit it. >> Dad, you're fine with it, obviously. You you have no uh moral reservations about genocides and killing babies. You've said all that on the show at home. You do. >> Yes. >> Okay. And so, what if he does do this? What if he destroys their power grids, their water plants, all of that stuff? >> That'd be horrific. I It would not be good. >> But would that change your >> off. >> Would that change your opinion of him? >> Yes. >> Would you stop supporting him? >> No, we have troops over there. As long as I have military troops over there >> the troops. You can support the troops and not No. No, you're wrong. You can support the troops and not support Trump. >> No, because he's the one going to bring them home safe. >> Well, he's already gotten a bunch of them killed, so I don't think that's right. Hello? >> Not a bunch. We do have people that have been killed there. >> If one person died unnecessarily, >> Right. >> isn't that terrible? >> Yeah, it is terrible. But yet you were yipping last week about how many military um airplanes and helicopters and things had to be used just to bring those two pilots out or a pilot and a gunner that you said that was all >> fake. >> Yeah. >> Yeah, I do think that that was fake. I don't think there were any pilots they were trying to retrieve. I think they were trying to get enriched uranium and the mission failed. >> Okay. Well, I don't agree with you on that one. >> Okay. Um my final question on this is the Strait of Hormuz was open for all transit without paying tolls before the war. So, everything that now goes through the strait, including oil, is going to cost more forever. Iran is not just going to be like, "Oh, the war over, everybody can go back to whatever they're doing. They're making [ __ ] loads of money off this and they're going to keep doing that. How has this made America better? >> They're not going to keep doing it cuz they're going to be annihilated. >> I'm going to say they're not going to keep doing it. >> They're going to be dead. >> Something's going to change, I'm afraid. Yes. >> Do you think >> Trump's going to sit by and let them do this. >> We're going to destroy Iran, just get ready for it. >> Do you think Trump will use a nuclear weapon in Iran? >> They don't have to. >> No. >> Okay. If he does, what would your opinion of that be? >> Good for him. >> I It'd be terrible. >> Okay. Dad, you say good for him. You don't think that once a nuclear weapon is used in modern history, it will open the door for everybody to start throwing them around? >> Yeah, who's going to do it? >> Yes, it would, China. >> Who's got the balls >> China. >> to do it? No. Trump. He's the only one. >> But the whole idea of mutually assured destruction >> the balls to do any of that. >> Okay. Let's move on. Um our next topic is Eric Swalwell. This week, California Congressman Eric Swalwell, the front-runner Democratic candidate for California governor, faced a wave of sexual misconduct allegations this week. Four women described sexual misconduct by Swalwell, including a former staffer who alleged he raped her while she was heavily intoxicated. The San Francisco Chronicle published an account from an anonymous former staffer who said Swalwell assaulted her in 2019 when she worked for him and again in 2024 at a New York gala. Another woman told CNN that Swalwell kissed her without consent and that she drank heavily with him before ending up in his hotel room. The women remain unnamed citing fear of retaliation. Swalwell denied the allegations in a video calling them flat false and blaming political opponents. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office announced Saturday it is investigating the alleged 2024 New York assault. Democratic reaction was swift. Hakeem Jeffries, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Ruben Gallego all called for an investigation, withdrew their endorsements of him, and urged him to exit the California governor's race. His campaign chair, Representative Jimmy Gomez, resigned. Lauren Boebert on the Republican side plans to have a vote to censure him, and Anna Paulina Luna plans a resolution to expel him from Congress. Mom, four women are accusing Eric Swalwell of sexual misconduct. Do you believe them? >> You forgot one person. The Chinese spy that he slept with for years. That right there disqualifies him. >> What was the question? >> Four women are accusing Eric Swalwell of sexual misconduct. Do you believe them? >> You know, again, we're back to kind of all of that. I I don't think it's up to me to believe, but I their testimonies sure look for real. I don't think we're going to have to make the call on this. I think all of his people around him will. As of this morning, he lost the last 21 endorsements he had by fellow Democrats and members of Congress. So, they must believe the women. Um It's very disturbing if this is true what happened, and he should be out of there. He's a piece of [ __ ] He needs to go. >> Dad, do you believe these women? >> Yes. >> There was one lady, too, that said it happened twice. >> Swalwell's been lying to the American public forever. >> There was one woman that said it happened twice. >> Do you think Eric Swalwell should be removed from government service? >> I know where you're going with this, Chad. I'm not stupid. >> He should be locked up put in prison. >> Okay. And where I'm going with it is obvious. >> Yes. Dad has a right. >> any of the dozens of women that have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct? >> They're all liars. >> Okay. Mom? >> I do not know. And if they if it is true, it's disgusting and let's go to trial. And I think >> to trial and he lost. He was found guilty of sexually assaulting E. Jean Carroll. >> Right. Civil. >> You keep saying civil as though that means it didn't happen. >> It didn't. >> only a civil case because the statute of limitations had expired on that crime. She could only bring a civil case. You understand that, right? >> Yes. Crimes against women like this are bad. >> Except when Donald Trump does them. >> politicians. I mean, go back to the Kennedys, my lord. Go back to them. >> Trump didn't do it. Swalwell did. >> That's what I mean. >> Why Why do you think that, Dad? >> Because of the character behind the person. >> Oh, that's good. I like that line. Yeah. >> But what what's Why do you think Eric Swalwell and Donald Trump What's the difference in character there? >> Well, one thing is Donald Trump got accused and got He got convicted in a New York court with a bunch of New York [ __ ] And Swalwell has been lying to the American public since day one. >> Okay. So, you just said that Trump got convicted in New York, which in your mind disqualifies the validity of the outcome of that trial, right? Okay. Swalwell is also getting investigated in New York. So, why do you believe that investigation >> being investigated in California. >> No, he's not. >> I think today >> Oh, yes, he is. >> No, he's not. >> Oh, yes, he is. >> No, it is it is New York. >> It's New York. >> No, it's not yet California. >> That's right. >> So, you're okay with California courts' findings? >> Well, somebody else besides New York >> Okay, so California courts you're okay with. >> I'm not okay with them, but they'll find him guilty. >> And you'll believe that outcome because it's California? >> That's right. >> Okay, so anything California finds in courts then you're good with. >> No. >> In today's world it's hard to >> that you have no [ __ ] idea what you're talking about. Just making sure. >> just one case and you don't know what the [ __ ] you're talking about. >> Okay, quit arguing. It's today's world it's hard to find good judges that aren't paid off, that aren't swayed by left or right. That's kind of the scary part now in today's world, too. >> So, you're saying then whatever is found in this Eric Swalwell case, you also won't believe that? >> I'll believe he did it. >> Okay. So, Dad, like you don't see that you have a clear bias >> Yeah, zero moral character. >> But the same can be said of Trump. >> No, it can't. >> I just did it. >> Well, you're wrong. >> You're wrong. Now what? >> wrong. >> I'm I'm trying to get you to look at the the base facts here. >> I I'm looking at I'm looking at Eric's Eric Swalwell is a big [ __ ] chicken [ __ ] liar who probably raped and pillaged many, many women and the bottom line is he tell he slept with a [ __ ] Chinese spy. You keep believing that out. >> What? >> That's a fact. >> Okay. You're misunderstanding something. >> I just want you to >> proven. >> Okay. Okay. I want you to just listen to what I'm saying. Don't interrupt me. Don't look out the window. Look at me while I'm saying this, okay? There are two guys. They have both been credibly accused of sexual assault. >> That's not true. >> You don't even know what guys I'm talking about. >> Yes, we do. >> No, you don't. >> You're making them up like you just want me to pick >> I'm I'm reducing >> to pick some generic [ __ ] I'm talking about Eric Swalwell. He's not a generic [ __ ] He's just an [ __ ] >> I'm just showing you what the facts are. These are two men in positions of extreme power who have abused that power. >> the window. >> Why can't you just listen to what I say? Why is it difficult? >> does it doesn't hold any validity. >> But do you think that I believe what you say does? >> No, and that's what's wrong with you. >> But I listen to you when you say these things and I engage you in a conversation. >> to you right now. >> But you don't engage in a conversation. You you scream out your >> You're you're you put up these fictitious [ __ ] deals where I got to pick one or the other. >> It's not fictitious. What are you talking about? >> similar to it. Eric Swalwell has zero moral character and Donald Trump and Donald Trump has a good character. >> Okay, I understand that you think that. I'm I'm asking you to take all of those things away. Take away the political parties, all of this, and just look at two guys who have positions of power abusing that power >> Let him talk. >> to sexually assault women. Why are they not the same? >> Because of their moral character. >> Dad tried to tell you that. >> I've told you that now for the fourth time. Not doing it again. >> So Trump's sexual assaults, of which he has been found guilty in court, to you don't matter because he has a good character? He's a good character sexual assaulter? >> That's right. He didn't do it. >> He did. He's found guilty of it. >> Doesn't matter. He didn't do it. >> What what would make you believe that he did? >> Nothing. >> That right there. Like take a second and just think about what you've said. That there's no way you could ever be convinced that Donald Trump committed sexual assault. Not if he's found If you saw a video of it, you wouldn't believe it? >> No. >> Why? >> Cuz it didn't happen and you're not going to You have no [ __ ] video. Will you just stop with your fictitious [ __ ] >> I'm not It's not fictitious. I'm >> up You make up crap. It ain't ever going to happen. He's never going to be found guilty. He's got superior moral character than [ __ ] Swalwell >> Uh-huh. >> by a mile and a half. And I'm not going to discuss it anymore. >> All right, moving on. Melania's absolutely insane press conference. This week, Melania Trump delivered a surprise statement at the White House denying ties to Jeffrey Epstein. She said the stories are completely false and called accusations that she was somehow involved smears. She insisted Epstein did not introduce her to Donald Trump that she met her husband at a 1998 New York party and called on Congress to hold public hearings for Epstein's victims, something Trump himself does not want to happen. The timing drew immediate attention because of Amanda Engarro, a 41-year-old Brazilian former model and ex partner of Trump's special envoy for global partnerships, Paolo Zampolli. Zampolli is widely credited with introducing Donald to Melania in 1998. As a 17-year-old model, Engarro had been flown to New York on Jeffrey Epstein's Lolita Express by her agent, Jean-Luc Brunel, an alleged Epstein co-conspirator. She and Zampolli were partners for nearly two decades and socialized regularly with the Trumps at Mar-a-Lago. After they split and entered a custody battle over their teenage son, Zampolli reached out to a top ICE official last June to have Engarro detained and deported to Brazil. Hours before Melania's statement, Engarro tweeted, "I have nothing left to lose in my life. I will tear down the entire system." And she threatened to expose what she knows about Melania and Trump and Epstein. Mom, why do you think Melania made this surprise statement denying her ties to Epstein? >> I know. It was very bizarre. I was very surprised. I was sitting on the couch doing something and she came on TV. I'm like, wait, what? I thought we that that the White House and Trump was like, we're going to get off the Epstein files and there she is talking about them. At first I thought could she be trying to deflect from the war? And then and then I was like, nah. Then I listened to her whole spiel. I'm like, okay. Then I immediately got online. I did my Tik Tok, I did my Instagram, I did my chat chat GBT. I came up with the names that you just said. Um the Brazilian model that was a friend of hers, more or less. Pay backs her hell, maybe. I don't know. It doesn't sound good. It doesn't sound right. >> Mhm. >> Um the guy that I guess he divorced her and then turned her into ice. And one of her I've got it on my iPad. She said more or less, I stood by your family. I stood by you and uh your husband. You knew I was being deported or whatever whatever. I was in uh the facility and you did nothing. So she said, I'm going to let people know. >> Dad, why do you think Melania gave her press conference? >> No idea. >> Yeah, he didn't I don't think he saw it. I told him about it. >> Okay. >> Um let me get what I've got. I've got some >> You didn't watch it, Dad? It wasn't on Newsmax? >> Um >> I didn't cover this one on Newsmax? >> It was on a regular channel. >> Yeah. >> It was on like was it on >> Newsmax covers everything. >> That's not right. I watch Newsmax every day now cuz I I want to see what you guys are watching. That's a [ __ ] dumpster fire. They don't cover any of the news. >> That's why they're That's why they're number one in cable news. >> There's >> Uh-oh. >> Okay. >> your John Tabacco the other night. We wondered if you're watching him. >> Yeah. >> Okay. It says, "Hello Melania. I was around you for 20 years. You knew I was inside ICE. And you know what hurts after all this time? You know what hurts? I stayed close to your family, your mother, your father, not because of you, but because of something. So, shut your mouth." And it says something like uh I can't see the rest, but it's more or less paybacks. Um I have nothing left to lose in my life. I will tear down the entire system. Be careful with me. Yeah, so that is not good. >> Yes. >> if this is true, >> do you think? >> what is going to come out of this. Whether she >> She's trying to blackmail him. >> That's what I'm asking. >> Yeah, whether she I I do think she's trying to. >> And she has nothing to do except she won't come on and tell you what they've done. >> She might. >> Let's see. >> Yeah, that's what I'm saying. What do you think, Chad? Uh-oh, Chad's glitching. Are you there? >> Um You're glitching. Yes, I'm here. Can you hear me? >> Hello. >> Yes, now >> You're glitching. Um I think I I don't know what she's going to reveal. I don't but it seems like something. And my question is, will you believe her when she reveals it? >> No. >> I think I might. Yes. Why would she just all of a sudden come out lying? and then why all of a sudden is Milani on TV? >> Because she wants something from them. >> Like what? >> Probably what yeah. >> Money? >> Hard telling. >> Blackmail? She was in a ice detention center and no one would help her. >> She got ripped away from her son. Her husband had her deported so he could get custody of their 14-year-old son. >> Right. And I guess back in New York didn't they were all in a circle long ago, right? There's a >> Yes. >> Yeah, they went around >> This is what Trump does to his friends. >> We'll see. >> them so that his richer friend can get the son. >> I totally want more of >> of good moral character. >> I totally want more of this in the future. I want to see how this comes out. >> see what happens. All right, so dad's completely unaware of it. Very interesting. Um >> Yeah, he didn't know. >> What's Let's simmer down a little bit. This week was Haley's birthday. That's why she's not here. I thought it would be fun for each of us to go around and say our favorite memory of Haley throughout our lives with her. Dad? >> Uh probably trying on a dress to stretch it out for her. >> It was this dry >> At Christmas. >> Can you Can you explain a little more of that? What do What do you mean? >> Yeah, she was a little too heavy for her dress. So I thought I'd put it on stretch it out. >> Yeah, I remember that. >> Yes, and I have the picture. I couldn't find it but I'll look for it again. Yeah, he literally put that dress on stretched it out took it off said here try this. And it fit her better. >> Mhm. Mom? >> I have a couple. Um Um She wanted to so badly be a part of your gang. Like what grade were you when you did the tent in the backyard? The guys with the tent. We would put up a tent. >> party? >> Yeah. >> Jesus, second or third grade? >> No, you were a little bit older, weren't you? >> I don't think so. >> It would have been in years and >> Fourth grade, maybe? >> Yeah. >> Don't don't say people's names. >> I'm sorry. So, we put up a tent in the backyard, Dad. And I have a picture of him putting the tent up. Have your friends spend the night for a birthday party. Haley wanted to be such a big part of that. And you guys kept telling her, "No, no, no." You made her take a pellet gun in the arm. To be part of >> grossly exaggerated. I had an old BB gun pistol that did not work. It was purely psychological. It shot nothing. >> Oh, so you never hit her in the arm with anything? >> No. >> I thought you did. I wish she was here to >> I did too. >> talk about this, cuz she told me you took a pellet gun and shot her in the arm. >> We packed it with hamster food. >> Okay. >> And I pretended to shoot her. Nothing The gun didn't work. Um My favorite memory of her also has to do with violence, though. It's not It's my favorite memory of her from her perspective, certainly not from mine. This is one Thanksgiving when we were at our grandparents' house. Uh she I was just like walking around a corner and she maybe she was like seven. I was Yeah, I think I was probably 12-ish in that range. She jumped out from around a corner with those little things that you put in the end of corn. >> Corn stabbers. >> Wham! Right in the stomach. I was bleeding and you guys didn't care. >> Corn stabbers. She got you. >> It was fun. Well, wherever you are, Haley. >> more. I've got one more. >> Oh, okay. >> Um I was um I was a high school coach of tennis and I took one day off >> Mhm. >> just for a little I I was feeling okay. I just took a day off. I had to. And Haley said, "Can I take the day off from school, too?" I go, uh I said, "Sure. Let's both stay home. We'll go have fun." We walked down to the little park by our house and we played tennis. >> Mhm. >> And all of a sudden, I see out of the corner of my eye this lady coming up with a camera. And she said, "Oh, hello. Do you mind if I take your picture?" I said, "What's this for?" She said, "The newspaper." She goes, "It probably won't even go in the newspaper." I said, "Sure, whatever." Took a picture of me and Haley playing tennis on a day when I was supposed to be off and Haley was supposed to be in school. And it did go in the paper of the town that we lived in. I had to explain that for a while. >> All right. Well, good memories. We hope Haley, wherever you are, if you're watching this and you're not, that you're happy having a good birthday gallivanting around the world. >> Next topic, Trump is insane. In addition to threatening to commit war crimes this week, Trump also found the time to tweet an attack on the Republicans who have turned against him due to his instability to run the country. I'm going to read this entire tweet. >> This will take a while. >> Don't get mad at me. This is your guy, Dad, that you said has good moral character. This is your good moral character president. >> Damn right. >> I know why Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones have all been fighting me for years, especially by the fact that they think it's wonderful for Iran, the number one state sponsor of terror, to have a nuclear weapon because they have one thing in common, low IQs. They're stupid people. They know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it. Look at their past. Look at their record. They don't have what it takes and they never did. They've all been thrown off television, lost their shows, and aren't even invited to TV because nobody cares about them. They're nut jobs, troublemakers, all caps, and will say anything necessary for some free and cheap publicity. Now they think they get some clicks because they have third-rate podcasts, but nobody's talking about them. By the way, nobody's talking about them. This is a 480-word tweet all about them. >> I know. >> Nobody's talking about them and their views are the opposite of MAGA, or I wouldn't have won the presidential election in a landslide. Maga agrees with me and just gave CNN a 100% approval rating of all caps ending quotes Trump. Not handing flailing fools like Tucker Carlson who couldn't even finish college. He was a broken man when he got fired from Fox and he's never been the same. Perhaps he should see a good psychiatrist. Perhaps he should. Or Megan Kelly who nastily attacked me, asked me the now famous only Rosie O'Donnell question or crazy Candace Owens who accuses the highly respected first lady of France of being a man when she is not. By the way, that's what you guys do as well and will hopefully win lots of money in the ongoing lawsuit. Actually, to me, the first lady of France is far more beautiful woman than Candace. In fact, it's not even close. Just openly insulting her. This is again your guy of high moral character. Or bankrupt Alex Jones who says some of the dumbest things and lost his entire fortune as he should have for his horrendous attack on families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims ridiculously claiming it was a hoax. So these so-called pundits are losers and they always will be. Now fake news CNN, the failing New York Times and all the other radical left news organizations are hailing them and giving them positive press for the first time in their lives. They're not Maga, they're losers just trying to latch on to Maga. As president, I could get them on my side anytime I want to. But when they call, I don't return their calls because I'm too busy on world and country affairs. Not that busy. He's writing 480 words of this [ __ ] >> Right. >> a few times they go nasty just like Marjorie traitor Brown. Why's he calling her Marjorie traitor? >> I don't know. >> I don't know what Brown. >> joke he's trying to do that's not working. But I no longer care about that stuff. I only care about doing right for our country. Maga is about winning and strength in not allowing Iran to have nuclear weapons. Maga is about making America great again and these people have no idea how to do that, but I do because the United States is now the hottest country anywhere in the world. President Donald J. Trump. >> Where was your accent at the end? You didn't do your accent. >> I could I wanted to get through it as fast as possible. Mom, do you think it's a good use of the president's time and attention to launch Twitter troll attacks on a bunch of YouTubers and podcasters while he's sending Americans to die in Iran? >> Well, when you said the last part, die in Iran, that's a no, but I think his rants are getting out of control. He needs to stop. Um these podcast Why is he watching the podcasters to begin with? I mean, these people though were on his side to start. Some of these podcasters were. >> Correct. >> kind of switched some of their thinking >> Yes. >> and and that probably is making him upset. But why >> he they're switching their thinking because they're watching what's happening. They're seeing that he has no plan in Iran and that that war is going terribly and it's increasing prices on everything for Americans. It's making our country worse. They're seeing that. >> Right. >> And they're saying, "Well, we don't support him anymore." >> They used to be the ones on his Right. They used to be the ones on his side 100% but >> Yeah. >> They They're They're switching gears and saying, "This isn't good and this isn't right." >> Yes. >> Now there's one podcaster still though left on completely on his side and I'm like he never says anything bad about him, ever. Ben Ben Shapiro. >> Mhm. >> Yeah, he's still the one way on the one side hanging on to Trump. >> Okay. >> And I've always wondered like Tucker, why did you switch? What's going on there? And then Megan Kelly's kind of making a little switch. >> Yeah, she had a a video this week this Thursday maybe or something. >> Well, maybe. >> Dad, in the post, he says nobody is talking about these people. But he himself is exactly doing that in a 480-word post. Do you think that is the tweet of a mentally stable person? >> Yes. >> He >> elaborate >> Cuz he he his end his end game is to exterminate Iran. >> Sorry, what does that have to do with this tweet? >> Chad asked if that rant that Trump just did was stable or not. >> Yes. >> Oh, he's saying yeah, okay. >> In in what way? >> it's stable. >> But that has nothing to do with the tweet. >> No. You know >> The tweet is about Hang on, Mom. The The tweet is about these Republican talking heads who are now turning on him. He doesn't like it. And so he writes >> Because they don't want they don't want to go to an extermination war, but he does. >> Okay. But in the tweet he says, "These people don't matter. Nobody's talking about them." Yet he himself is talking about them in one of the longest tweets I've ever seen. >> explaining to the public why they don't matter. >> But if they don't matter, why would he make this tweet? >> Because they don't matter. >> The one >> Have you ever written a 480 word tweet? >> No. >> Do you know how long that takes? How much effort that takes? >> Yes, I do. You just read the [ __ ] >> Right. So if these people don't matter, why is he spending that much time and effort talking about them? >> Cuz he's he's rebuttaling them on the fact that he's going to exterminate Iran. >> Okay. >> You know, one of those podcasters I used to watch all the time and I don't anymore is Tucker. I think he's trying to position himself maybe more leaning toward himself running for office or or going closer to Vance. >> Fine. But like this past election, I think both of you, even you, Dad, would probably agree that podcasters really swayed the election. Trump went on Joe Rogan, he went on Theo Von, he went on some of these other right-wing podcasts and he won because of that. And then Kamala was kind of trying to play catch-up. She went on Call Her Daddy, but it was like a little too little too late. It was like the Republicans figured out, we need to be on these podcasts talking to the voters through this channel because more people watch this. And then the Democrats tried to be like, "Oh, well, we'll do it, too." And it just didn't work. Um, now all of these podcasters, even Joe Rogan, has turned against Trump. They are all turning on him. So, whether you think they're full of [ __ ] or not, doesn't matter. >> Well, well, what Hold on. When is the election, by the way? >> Yeah. >> Which one? The midterms? >> The next The next >> presidential >> presidential election. >> We have some years. >> And Congress. >> It's a way. >> 3 years off. >> Yeah. >> So, you come back and tell me how wrong they all are in 3 years. >> 2 years. 2026 or 2028. >> I don't know what you're talking about. The point I'm trying to make here >> I know you don't know what I'm talking about. That's exactly the point I'm making. >> Is what? >> have a [ __ ] clue. >> Good one. >> You got me. Real zinger. >> Yeah, I think the rants need to stop. Enough is enough. Uh, somebody needs to hook that >> doing it every day. So, like to compose that that tweet, probably takes at least 20 minutes, I would guess. >> X or or Truth Social? >> It's on Truth Social. >> So, okay. >> So, he's at the very least, he's spending 20 minutes of his day actively thinking about these people, writing and posting this tweet. When we're literally at war. He is sending people to die. >> he wrote that tweet? >> There ain't no way he didn't write that. He's at least dictating it. I know that he has somebody who follows him around and dictates. >> He's not sitting down 20 minutes and writing it. >> Yeah, he's sitting down with the person who types it out, 100%. >> Right. >> Now, have you heard the >> Wait a minute. Wait a minute, Mom. How Dad, how do you think it works? >> I think somebody types it up, gives it to him, and says, "What do you think?" >> And you think he reads 480 words? >> No, I think he hits the highlights. >> Okay. >> That's why half that shit's garbage. >> That That's not how it works. There've been articles written about this. He has somebody that >> articles written about it. >> How about do you >> They're sitting right there watching it. Yeah, sure. >> Who do you think runs the Tik Tok White House page? >> I don't know who runs it. Um or the Instagram, but they're posting all the different memes showing people dying and stuff. Well, speaking of, but we have two more topics. Let me just hit this one quickly cuz it >> Let me say who I think runs that. I think Barron Trump runs that. The Tik Tok page. >> believe so. Barron Trump's going to have to go to war. He has to enlist. >> Maybe. >> Um >> No, he won't. >> He's too tall. >> Sole surviving son. >> Oh, yeah, sole surviving son. >> Don't matter. He has to register for the draft. That's the law now. >> Okay. >> He already has. So is your nephew. >> Okay. The Trump also posted >> up for the draft 3 4 years ago. >> Trump also posted this week a brutal murder on Truth Social. Just posted an unedited video of a woman getting murdered with a hammer. Did you see this? >> You told me it was on the White House.gov >> just read it quickly. About >> No, I didn't tell you that. >> Truth Social. >> Correct. I didn't tell you it was on WhiteHouse.gov. Didn't say that at all. About an hour after Melania's strange announcement at the White House, Trump also posted unedited crystal clear video of a woman being brutally murdered. The video was an uncensored 20-second surveillance video showing a woman being bludgeoned to death with a hammer. The footage captured the April 3rd killing of Niloufer Esman, a 51-year-old gas station clerk, mother of two, and Bangladeshi immigrant who had become a US citizen outside a Chevron station in Fort Myers, Florida. The video shows a man smashing her SUV windshield to lure her outside then striking her in the face continually and in the head after she fell. Trump used the video to attack immigration policy writing that quote an illegal alien criminal from Haiti had been quote released into our country by the worst president in history crooked Joe Biden. Mom, why do you think Trump posted a video of a woman being brutally beat to death with a hammer? >> He's trying to say enough is enough. We shouldn't have to watch videos like that. >> Agreed. So, why is he posting it? >> This was during the Biden administration when they granted that man and all the Haitians protective status. >> Okay. So, you're not you're not answering the question. Why did he post that video? >> To tell us this is not right and we need to do something about this. >> Okay. So, you're not answering the question. Why did he post the video? >> To let us see what they're doing to us. >> You can just even if he wanted to draw attention to this, he can literally just say this guy brutally killed this woman with a hammer. Why post the video? >> Because because in writing we've been telling you all this and nobody's been doing a darn thing. It's time to do something about this. That's what he's trying to say, I guess. With the visual. Why aren't you guys saying wow, this is bad. Let's do something about it. >> Of course it's bad. What are you talking about? Of course it's bad. Anybody getting murdered for any reason by anyone is bad. >> So, we need to change that protective status issue on Haitians. >> Because of this one guy? >> here it is. They they're protected. >> Dad, do you have any problem with him posting videos of brutal murders? >> No. >> As long as he does a 480-word tweet about Tucker Carlson beforehand, you're okay with it? >> We shouldn't have to watch that. >> I'm trying to illustrate to you his online behavior is erratic at best and it's getting crazier. >> His techniques, yeah. >> But that's a United States president is posting these things. You guys have no problem with >> it, isn't he? Yeah, he does have his talking about it. >> He's got you talking about it, smart guy. >> Yeah, he's got everybody talking about it because he's deranged and he's the leader of the free world and now he's threatening to commit genocide and war crimes and he's posting videos of people getting brutally murdered and he's talking to people who have podcasts. He's getting flustered by podcasters while he's posting murder videos and threatening genocide and war crimes. >> I think he's >> That's not a stable person. >> He's a president like we've never had before. This is for real. But yeah, these rants got to quit. >> what your problem is? You can't take reality. So you make [ __ ] up with fictitious people who don't even [ __ ] exist and try to compare one to the other, which is absolutely nuts. >> Are you going back to the Eric Swalwell thing? >> Maybe. >> No, you're I'm going back to the >> You got one guy that convicted of this and another guy that did this. Those are two fictitious people. >> There are people around him, Chad, that are not going to let him continue some of these rants and stuff. This is enough. >> He's do He's been doing it for years. >> Not years. >> Nobody's stopping him. How can they? >> What do you mean years? He's only been president for a year. >> I don't know what he's doing. >> No. See, he pulls [ __ ] out of his >> I I don't know if you guys remember, he was president for 4 years before this. >> Yeah. >> He's been in the political sphere for 10 years. >> But the podcasters >> of this the whole time. >> The podcasters haven't been. >> Okay, we're we one more topic here. This is Pete Hegseth lying about the war. This week, Pete Hegseth was caught lying about American casualties in the war. US service members who survived a March 1st Iranian drone strike at the port of Shuwaikh in Kuwait said Hegseth lied about what happened. The attack killed six US service members and wounded more than 20. More than 30 military members were hospitalized and US Central Command initially claimed only five had been seriously wounded. At a March 2nd press briefing, Hegseth described the strike as a rare quote squirt that that quote squeaked through defenses hitting a tactical operations center that was quote fortified. Soldiers who were inside the structure rejected that account. One injured soldier told CBS speaking anonymously due to military rules, quote, "Painting a picture that one squeaked through is a falsehood. I want people to know the unit was unprepared to provide any defense for itself. It was not a fortified position." After the strike, soldiers triaged each other with makeshift bandages and tourniquets and commander and commandeered civilian vehicles to drive the wounded to Kuwaiti hospitals. One survivor told CBS the hardest part was knowing they couldn't get everybody out before extraction teams arrived for the fallen. Republicans spent years investigating the 2012 Benghazi attack where four Americans died, yet there has been no Republican demand for an investigation to the six US troops killed and the lie Pete Hegseth told about what happened. Mom, who do you believe about what happened in the strike? Pete Hegseth or the >> I believe a little bit of both. Fortified, too. When he said fortified, that doesn't mean that it's concrete and they can't get through. I think this war with drones is a whole new ballgame. A drone can get through things. We know this. >> Okay. >> Whether they're flying high, low, in between things. So, I believe a little bit of both. >> Dad, who do you believe? Pete Hegseth or the US military members who say he's lying? >> Hegseth. >> So, you think the military soldiers are lying? >> Yes. >> Well, a drone did get through. >> Because it's to their advantage. They don't want to go, oh, we [ __ ] up. >> Even a Even a very >> Even though they did [ __ ] up, they're not going to admit it. >> Even a very heavy fortified place, uh what do I say? Like a military base, things can get through there. I mean, I I've never been in the military, I don't know. I've never been instructed what to do, but I would think something could get through. >> Mom, you're constantly on this show, especially since this war started, talking about how you have to support our military. >> Yes, I did. >> you think they're lying. And Pete Hegseth is telling the truth. Or sorry, Dad just said that. >> Yeah, I don't >> a minute. No, no, no. >> Well, why are you telling Mom she said it? I said I believed a little bit above >> Right, but you can't believe both because they're the opposite things. Hegseth is saying, uh a little drone squeaked through, it was a fortified position, and the soldiers are saying, no, this was a full-on attack. It blew up 30 [ __ ] people, we couldn't get them all out, and we we're not prepared, it was not fortified. They are two completely opposing accounts of this. You cannot believe both. >> Then, what do we do? It's a um Is it It's not congressional, but let's have a hearing and bring people in and see what went wrong. >> Yes, an investigation, like they did in Benghazi. >> we can be safe, >> Well, >> the Republicans aren't doing >> happened at Benghazi. >> The Republicans aren't holding hearings, they're not going to do an investigation. >> Time is up. >> No, time is not up. Dad, let me just ask you, do you want to do this show anymore? >> What? >> Do you want to do this show anymore? >> Right. Yeah, but you drag it on for an hour and a half. >> No. >> We've been recording for 57 minutes. >> There you are. >> Be polite. Do I need to put you up in the spaceship? >> You just seem like you don't want to engage in any of these conversations or be here at all. You don't have to be. >> same old [ __ ] over and over. >> Okay. No. >> Yeah, you also are presenting the same old [ __ ] over and over. >> Yeah, because you make me. >> Okay. I just want to ask one more time, Dad, you are basically saying now US military members lie. >> Yes. >> Okay. And so, you too though, on this show have said that you support the military. You were uh you served in the Air Force. >> I support factions of the military. I don't support a bunch of lying [ __ ] >> Okay. So, you think these people who narrowly survived a drone attack in the current >> survived. How many of them died? >> Six. >> Six. >> Six. >> Out of how many? >> And 30 were And 30 had to go to the hospital. >> It's no big deal. >> So, you think six Americans dying is not a big deal? >> No. >> Oh my gosh. >> Okay. And you believe then all of these people are lying. >> Yes. >> Okay. Mom, you at least are on the fence here. You say you believe a little bit of both. I told you that can't be possible. They are saying contradictory things. >> an investigation. >> Okay. And so then, what do you think should happen if they do open investigation and it's found that Hagel Seth lied about this? >> People in charge that lie need to be gone. >> Except Trump. >> and and not fully transparent. I told you that several >> several podcasts ago with Pam Bondi and who's gone. And I said Trump would get rid of her if she doesn't open these files and get this on. >> But Trump lies constantly. >> I don't think constantly. >> Yes. Well, I mean, obviously there's times when he's sleeping. But let me I have this um God damn it, do I have this somewhere? I I found this thing. Somebody sent it to me. Here it is. This was sent to me. I'm just going to read you these things. This is 36 days of Trump's tweets that contradict themselves over the course of the war. Okay. >> Okay. >> This might take 1 minute or something. Dad, are you leaving? >> He's got to go to the bathroom. He'll be back. >> Okay. March 3rd. These are all direct quotes from him. He either said this at like a press conference or tweeted it. March 3rd, we won the war. March 7th, we defeated Iran. March 9th, we must attack Iran. March 9th, the war is ending almost completely and very beautifully. March 11th, you never like to say too early you won. We won. In the first hour it was over. March 12th, we did win, but we haven't won completely yet. March 13th, we won the war. March 14th, please help us. March 15th, if you don't help us, I will certainly remember it. March 16th, actually we don't need any help at all. March 16th, I was just listen I was just testing to see who's listening to me. March 16th, if NATO doesn't help, they will suffer suffer something very bad. March 17th, we neither need nor want NATO's help. March 17th, I don't need congressional approval to withdraw from NATO. March 18th, our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz. March 19th, US allies need to get a grip, step up, and help open the Strait of Hormuz. March 20th, NATO are cowards. March 21st, the Strait of Hormuz must be protected by countries that use it. We don't use it. We don't need to open it. March 22nd, this is the last time I will give Iran 48 hours open the straight. March 22nd. Iran is dead. March 23rd. We had a very good productive talk with Iran. March 24th. We're making progress. March 24th. They gave us a present and the present arrived today and it was a very big present with a tremendous amount of money. March 25th. They gave us a present and the present arrived today. Oh, sorry. Tremendous amount of money. I'm not going to tell you what the present is, but it was a very significant prize. March 26th. Uh make Make a deal or we'll keep blowing them away. March 27th. We don't have to be there for NATO. Um March 28th then he claimed that talks were progressing. March 30th. Open the Strait of Hormuz immediately or face devastating consequences. >> Okay, we get it. We get it. We get it. >> He's going back and forth. We don't need NATO. [ __ ] NATO. NATO better help us. >> We get it. There's parts of this not >> No, he's going to help us. >> So when they don't, we can dump them. >> We get >> Right, but you're not understanding. He contradicts himself sometimes in the same [ __ ] sentence. He has claimed that we've won the war, yet we need to send more troops to the war. He has claimed we don't need NATO's help, yet they should be helping us. He has claimed the Strait of Hormuz shouldn't be blocked, then he blocks it himself or at least he's threatening to do that. You can see how this is not >> two weeks how this is going to go. It's it's >> you're not Answer what I'm saying. Answer what I'm saying. Why does he contradict himself all the [ __ ] time? >> I have no idea. >> But doesn't that make you think this is a guy who doesn't know what the [ __ ] he's doing? >> No, I think he knows. It's just I don't know. One day he thinks this, next day he thinks that. >> you people don't know what the [ __ ] you're doing. >> Okay. Dad, half your face is cut off. That's a sign to end the show, I suppose. Um thank you all for joining us. Happy birthday Haley, wherever you are out there in the world gallivanting. >> Gallivanting. >> Mom, thank you for doing this. I love you. Dad, I love you, too. Haley, I love you. Happy birthday. Mom and Dad, I want you to do something a little different today. I want you to tell me you love me, tell Haley you love her, then I want you both to turn and look at each other in the eyes and tell each other you love each other. >> Oh my god. Why are What are you doing, Counselor Chad? Chad, I love you. Haley, I love you. Gallivanting, I know where you are. Text me when you touch down. from around the minute >> Chad, I love you. Haley, I love you. Mary Lou, I love you. >> Look, no. Hold the gaze. >> I love you. >> Hold it, Dad. Look at each other for a second and tell each other you love each other. >> Yeah, I do. We just did. >> Counselor Chad >> Do it, Dad. Look at Mom. And now tell each other. No, Dad. Do it. Don't break the gaze. >> Just go. >> No. No. >> be done with the show. >> Yeah. >> I love you. >> I love you. >> Okay. See? A nice moment. Thank you all for joining us. I'll be back with you, Mom, tonight. >> Yes. >> 6:00 p.m. PST, right? You're on our YouTube channel. >> I'll be on until we're two strikes, and that's it. >> Okay, yeah. Please be nice to my mom. She will leave the the live if she gets mean comments. So, join us for that 6:00 p.m. PST tonight. Until then, thank you. >> Bye.