Transcript
Full text
In the aftermath of the 2024 election, America is even more divided than before. Half the country fears the end of democracy, and the other half welcomes it. As America inches toward the brink of authoritarian rule, now more than ever, we must force ourselves to have the necessary conversation. Welcome to the necessary conversation. I'm Chad Culchin. With me is my sister. She's reading something very important. more important than this program clearly. And my mom, Mary Lou, who has on her nicest Trump hat today, and my dad has returned to us. Dad, how are you feeling after your hip surgeries? >> Little better. >> All right, you're up. You're moving? >> Yeah. >> Watching Newsmax still? >> Yes. >> Okay. Good to hear from you. How are you feeling? >> Better. >> All right. This is going to be a fun one. Mom, do you have any diddies for us? You said I know you do because you sent me a picture. >> Do Yeah, I probably have too many, but we're not going to start with that picture. We're going to start with this. First lady Melania Trump has put former first son Hunter Biden on notice, but he's not flinching. On August 6th, the first lady threatened to sue the son of the former president Joe Biden for more than $1 billion dollars if he doesn't retract the claim that she was introduced to her husband by the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. >> Yeah, there's a riff going on here. Um, she said that's all fake, that's not true, and you better not say that. You better stop this. Uh, but she has put him on legal notice. She has her attorney. They are demanding that he immediately retracts the false statement about her >> and his response to her back. Oh, and this happened uh it was an interview that Hunter Biden had made um earlier in the month on the YouTube channel Five with Andrew Callahan, >> Channel 5. >> His response back to her was, "F that. That's not going to happen." said, uh, citing news reports dating back to 20 2019. >> We get it. >> Yeah. So, I hope she sues the crap out of him. >> All right. >> And everything that I've seen of him lately on TV. Looks like he's been on a 10day binge on cocaine or something. He looks weird. He talks weird. >> Your fixation on cocaine is is very intense. >> I want to know. No one has told me who's cocaine. >> Have you ever done cocaine, >> Chad? I have never done cocaine. My lord. >> No. >> Why would your dad and I do cocaine? Jesus. >> I was curious. You seem to be very interested in it. >> Okay. Number two. Um I was I was uh recognized in public for the first time. The ladies. >> Congratulations. I know that this has been a dream of yours for basically my entire life. Fame. >> No. My dream has to been in a to be in a movie that you directed, produced, or wrote, which I had a sliver of a chance. You said it would never happen. You had no control over that. >> But then I click on the movie Bert Wondersstone and there you are. So you had some control. I was never in the movie. >> Okay. >> Number two. So, I w I was recognized in public and I didn't know how to react because there were a lot of people around. A lot of people don't like me. Some people like me. I was like, "Oops, oopsie." Goes, "We didn't know you lived in Oklahoma. Oopsie. I'll see y'all later. Out of here. Bye." >> Okay. >> Number three. Oh, but I do kind of know now how Taylor Swift feels. >> Yeah. >> It's a weird feeling. It is. Okay. >> He recognized me and then she talked about, "Oh, there's a man on there that he's real grumpy and he says no, no, no." A lot. Is that your husband? Yeah. So, anyway. >> Okay. >> Number I'm going to save drones for next year. >> Okay. We got to wrap this up. Go to the >> Okay. No, no, no. My best one. >> Is this the one picture >> now? Oh, this is nice. Now you're shaming me only into a couple of diddies. >> We have a lot of stuff to get to today that we're five minutes into the show already. The world can seem a bit crazy at times, but in Halealley state of Texas, where dad and I lived, >> and I like Texas. We've always liked Texas. >> [ __ ] hole. >> Okay. Denton, Texas. Well, let's see if this patriot is a [ __ ] hole to you. >> Is this the picture you sent me? >> Yes. >> This man's name is Eon Burke. He is a male carrier in Denver. >> Hang on a minute. I'm now just looking at this picture for the first time with real scrutiny. >> Did you just take a picture of your computer screen? >> Yes, I did. You know, I do this. >> Jesus Christ. >> Don't call me out on it. >> All right, get to it. What? >> My Google photo thing won't email. Roman needs to help me. >> Okay, so Eon Burke, he's a mail carrier. >> There he is. >> It's Ian. I'm sure of it. >> Ian Burke. He is a patriot of the day week month because he was a mailman >> for years. He would go up to this house where that dog lived and they became friends. >> The man that owned that dog was an elderly wheelchairbound Vietnam vet. And then we know what happened. The poor man died. The Vietnam man died. >> Okay. >> So the male cure kept going the house going, "Okay, where's the man? Where's the dog?" He asked neighbors and they said, "Sadly, the man has passed." And he goes, "Where's the dog?" And they said, "They took him to the pound." And he goes, "Oh my goodness." The next morning he was there 20 minutes before the pound opened and he adopted Floyd. Floyd is a 70B mut and now he lives with the postman. >> To me, that he stepped up when he didn't have to for animals. You know, our family loves animals. Yeah. >> To me, that is like patriot of the day, month and year. >> I salute you, >> Eon. >> Thank you, Eon. Thank you for those diddies. Now, let's get into the show. Here we are going to start with a question from a listener. If you want to send us a question, please record it in a one minute or shorter audio or video format, but I really prefer video. Today's is audio, but I prefer video. And email it to the necessary conversation [email protected]. Are we ready for the question? >> Yeah. >> Ready? >> Here we go. >> Hello, coach and family. My name is Ben from Concord, North Carolina. I grew up in a military family. I served myself and later earned a degree in political science. In previous conversations, we've heard Chad and Haley say that Marylu and Bob aren't completely bad, that they've helped others and done good things in the past, but they also support causes that harm others or infringe on others rights. My question is, do you believe that someone can bank enough good deeds to excuse a bad deed or mistreating someone today? Bob, I wish you a speedy recovery. I can't wait till you're back on the show. Thank you. Bye. >> There you have it. Uh Haley, you want to go first? You want me to go first on this? >> Let me go first. >> Okay. >> Yes. I'm back on the show. And uh I'm going to I'm going to just throw it out there right now. Nothing has changed. Uh you uh just because you served in the military doesn't make you a true veteran. >> What? >> It doesn't. It doesn't. >> That wasn't the question. Um, and it literally does. That's the definition of that. >> No, it doesn't. Okay. >> Okay. >> The question was, >> what what he's implying what he's implying is that anybody that's been in the military, >> it can be construed as a veteran. >> And I don't believe that. >> That's not the question. >> That is what it a that's not the question. But if you were in if you served in the military, you are a veteran. That's >> No, that's not true. >> How do you say that is not true? >> Okay. because I don't know how long he was in the military. I don't know what his situation was. How he may have been in the National Guard for all I know. >> Okay. But the question was if someone in the past has done bad things >> like who? >> No, the question is I mean you guys just didn't listen to the question. You heard that he was in the military and that was all you heard. The question is this. You guys openly support policies and ideas that fundamentally harm other people. But Haley and I are always saying you're not bad people. So what he's asking is if you've done good deeds in the past, is there some limit to those that can offset your morally bankrupt attitude about humanity? Now >> you you either believe what we believe or you don't believe what we believe. >> Not the question. Um it is >> I will answer this. I don't think that it is a zero sum game of good deeds to bad deeds. I believe all human beings have within us the capability to be altruistic and competitive uh self-serving versus helping others. And it's like, you know, I know my parents say a lot of [ __ ] wild [ __ ] but just on a core fundamental level, every human being is probably doing something in their lives that is for self-interest. Even if you just drill down to like, do you buy Amazon products? Do you use an iPhone? Do you wear Nike clothing? Uh, do you buy [ __ ] from the Gap or Old Navy? What kind of car do you drive? All of these things are just generically speaking [ __ ] terrible for humanity, >> but we all use them because of the convenience and and whatever else, you know? >> I kind >> So, it's like >> I kind of I kind of say this [ __ ] you know, I have people that I that I deal with pretty much on a daily basis, people that are around me like almost every day. And you know there there is that question like you know your parents are shitty people because they vote for XYZ. And I'm like well you [ __ ] eat animals. You contribute to factory farming and polluting the planet and you [ __ ] eat animals but you have dogs and you have cats and all this [ __ ] So like how do you reconcile that? What you know like at at what level do you want to really go to? Because everyone is kind of a piece of [ __ ] on some level. >> Like you said we're all we're all using [ __ ] Amazon. Okay, you're wearing animals on your feet and you're consuming them. You [ __ ] have a gas guzzler. I mean, there you you want to break it down, break it down. Everyone is a piece of [ __ ] on some level. It's just the way it is. >> My turn. >> No one is [ __ ] immune to this. So, >> thank first of all, thank you for your service. You to me that does mean something. It means a lot. He didn't understand. He wasn't getting it, I guess. But then the question I was thinking he was asking like in your past maybe this whole question went way over my head. I was thinking he was saying like in the past if you'd done something bad in the future you do something good are you still a good person? >> He was asking basically can you have these kind of like antihumanistic views which you and dad both do. Um dad has multiple times called for genocides. He supports these ideas. Can you have those ideas? >> No calling for it. I know. Can you have those ideas and still be considered a good person if you have done enough good deeds in other areas of your life to kind of offset, you know, basically he's asking like where is the the balance, the mathematical tipping point of good person versus bad person. If you've done x amount of good deeds versus x amount of bad deeds or hold x amount of good intentions versus x amount. >> It depends on who considers it a good deed and a bad deed. >> Let's just say this. >> Kim and I don't agree to that. >> Let's just say I'm a good person and move on. >> So there. >> Okay. I hope that answered your question. >> Try to do your best. >> Yeah, >> we didn't answer that question at all. I'm so sorry. And thank >> Okay, >> the answer is I don't believe any person is good or bad. I think we all have equal parts. Altruistic or or not equal parts, but we all have some parts in us that are altruistic and some that are competitive. You can view that as good or bad, but good or bad are relative terms. Good or bad for who? To what? To what role? To you know what I So, it's a dumb question. >> I'm not saying it. No, I I chose the question because I liked it. What? A dumb question at all. >> Dumb. >> How do you get a zero some game out of that? You don't You don't ever get a zero sum game. >> All right. Speaking of zero sum game, >> it's a dumb question. >> Okay. >> All right. Before we get into our main topics, we have floated the idea and talked about the idea on this show that the 2024 election might have been hacked. I want to play two pieces of video for you that we're both going to watch or all four of us are going to watch and then we're going to discuss. The first video is a a string of Trump's comments and one by Elon Musk in order of how they were said. I want to play those for you, then we can discuss. Are you ready? >> Yep. >> This is again in regard to the 2024 election possibly having been hacked by Republicans. Here we go. and vote just this time. You won't have to do it anymore. Four more years. You know what? It'll be fixed. It'll be fine. I don't need any votes. We got all the votes we need. I don't need votes. >> We don't need votes. We got more votes than anybody's ever had. You don't have to vote. Don't worry about voting. The voting. >> They're cheating again. And Elon, he goes, "No, you're going to win. They just don't know it yet." And about 15 minutes later, we won. you know, sort of crazy. He was very effective and he knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote counting computers. And we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide. So, it was pretty good. It was pretty good. So, thank you to Elon. I I'm I'm a I'm a technologist. I know a lot about computers. And I'm like, the last thing I would do is trust a computer program. Um because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line. Okay, so we heard Trump that was all along the campaign trail telling people they don't need to vote, he doesn't need your votes, and that Elon Musk knows the vote counting computers better than anybody. And then you have Elon Musk saying essentially that he can hack voting systems very easily. Does that at all, Mom, have any impact on how you view the possibility of the 2024 election being hacked? >> No, >> Dad. >> No. >> So, what do you think Trump was saying? What did he mean when he says we don't need your votes? >> Because enough people were going to vote for him anyway. >> But then he would need votes. He would need those people to vote. So why would he say we don't need >> any more votes, >> right? What does that mean? >> You guys are just >> It means he's got the next election locked up. >> Yeah, >> that's what it means. >> He won the election >> without votes. >> Y'all need to move on. >> Well, okay, fine. You're going to ignore this one. Let me play this next clip for you. This clip has a dude who has compiled all the statistics. He compares the Hillary Clinton election to the 2024 election in North Carolina where he is showing you the disparity in votes of these down these uh drop off ballots where people voted for the under ticket but did not >> a dead tree. >> All right, >> some hard numbers. Well, we did pull some hard numbers for North Carolina. Harris received 122,000 fewer votes than the superintendent uh race and then while Trump received 191,000 more votes. This is a baseline. This very quickly shows you what is normal look like. This was Trump versus Hillary Clinton and this is North Carolina. And the way you read these graphs is this is a down ballot difference or drop off comparison graph. At the bottom you have every county in North Carolina and then that's the uh the x- axis and then there is on the y- axis which is the the left side you have a comparison of how many votes did the president get >> you just look at >> compared to the superintendent in this case if you are above 0% on this graph you got more votes if you are below 0% you got less votes and then in each county there is two bars there is a blue bar for the Democrats and then there is a red/ orange bar for the republic Republicans, if this is what normal looks like, I'm going to show you 2024 for North Carolina. >> Mhm. >> And then I will uh I'll just let you look at this. >> Jesus Christ. >> That is the same reaction I get every time. Everyone just says, "What is going on?" We're seeing across every county in North Carolina, Harris is getting less votes than the superintendent and Trump is always overperforming. And what's interesting is there is almost a mirroring effect on this graph. That means that generally speaking in places where Harris is getting less votes, Trump is um getting a overperformance that somewhat mirrors that number of votes. So y'all, what Nathan is saying is we're looking at North Carolina right now. The superintendent of schools in the state of North Carolina consistently outperformed Kla Harris. I just want folks think about that for a minute. This generally can't be caused by voter by like normal human voting behavior. Unless a candidate is super unpopular, this may happen. The problem is this is so consistent that this raises red flags because normal human voting behavior, if it looks more like 2016, this is the polar opposite. If you were taking votes from one candidate at the presidential race and giving them to the other, it could create that mirroring effect we're seeing here. >> Okay. So, you saw that? >> That was a waste of time. >> Well, clearly it was for you, Dad. You didn't even look at the video I was presenting. You were watching TV. >> That's exactly what you were showing. >> I I looked right at you. You were watching tele. >> Trump out performs. Oh, I saw it. I don't need to stare at for an hour. >> It's not. He's literally looking He's looking at nothing. >> I don't think so. Mom's being quiet. What's on TV, Mom? >> Hello. >> It's going off. I don't think he knows how to look. >> I can look I know more about graphs than anybody in this little uh conversation. >> The graph master. What are you talking about? >> What is graph? >> I can tell you right now that none of that [ __ ] matters. >> Okay, >> that's that is a total waste of your [ __ ] time. Well, it matters to me because I'm a logical human and watching this [ __ ] play out, I am 100% that graph won't mean [ __ ] in the in the election. >> I am 100% convinced that we will never have a fair election again. We are all [ __ ] and I'm just looking at other countries at this moment to like figure out where I'm going to live because I believe in democracy and it's dead. >> I've heard about this. >> Dad is ignoring this graph which is like hardcore statistical evidence again in every county in North Carolina. All it does is say it all that graph does is prove what I've been telling you. >> You really believe that more people voted for the superintendent of schools than did the president of the United States? >> Yes. >> Okay. >> More Democrats. I mean, >> so you guys have not you've not been in >> for Democrats. >> You probably don't even vote for like your state elections. Am I right? >> You're wrong. >> You do? >> Yeah. I go I don't buy. >> I don't think you're telling the truth, but I'm going to tell you. >> I don't think you know your ass from a hole in the ground. >> I'm gonna tell you here like when we have local elections, the turnout is like [ __ ] abysmal. >> Yeah. >> There are not a lot of people that come for like local elections. The presidential election, >> [ __ ] everyone votes, >> right? >> Why are we talking about past elections? >> And who gives a rat's ass what you are talking about past election? None of it matters. It's all [ __ ] Hang on. Hang on. Mom's saying, "Why are we talking about past right now between you and Haley?" Is total [ __ ] >> Okay, we're going to keep talking about [ __ ] Donald Trump is [ __ ] >> Hang on, hang on, hang on. Mom asked, "Why are we talking about past elections?" You guys constantly talk about past elections. >> You always The 2020 election was stolen. >> Yeah, you're the one talking about it, >> but I'm not just talking about it. I'm showing you hard data. Mom, >> you're a bunch of titty babies. Always have been. >> Okay, Mom. You saw that graph, Mom. You saw that graph. >> How can you look at that graph, Mom? >> Mom, how can you look at that graph and think anything other than they were cheated? Something weird is going on here? >> How do we know that that statistic that he posted up there is true? How do we know? >> Deny the reality. We know it's not AI. >> In other words, it wasn't AI. >> All right, let's move on to our first topic. Actually, before we get to our first topic, >> something that [ __ ] matters. >> How about this? Dad, happy anniversary. It is today the three-year anniversary of this very show. >> Yeah. So, >> turn the I mean, three years. >> Turn the TV back on. >> Turn it off. I don't know how to do it. >> It's off. >> We've been doing this podcast for three years. Um, I do believe it has, even though we're arguing right now, has brought us closer to FA together as a family. >> Why are you jumping on me about [ __ ] that don't matter? >> What [ __ ] >> Whatever you're yaking about right now. >> I'm telling you happy anniversary. >> So what? >> Why? I don't understand how you're so mad at me just saying we've done the show for three years. >> The show. >> Okay. See, you are watching that and you're not looking at chat. Yeah, you have to pay attention to what we're talking about. That's how >> I do. Yeah, I gotta look at some [ __ ] graph that some monkey made up five hours ago. >> Okay. >> Well, I'm not going to show any more graphs. Let's just get into it. Happy anniversary, everybody else. I'm um >> happy >> proud of us. I'm kind of impressed that we've been able to do this in in some capacity for three years. And uh you know, hopefully we'll get to continue doing >> much longer. I don't [ __ ] know. Is dad back on Newsmax or you just staring at the blank TV now? >> I don't He won't. >> I'm not looking at any Godamn it. I can't even look at Look, I'm gonna look over here now. >> You're supposed to see how it works is you look at the [ __ ] camera. >> Yeah. Look at us. >> Engage. >> Look at us. >> He's there. >> Yeah. Happy. >> Yes. Okay. Our first topic is Trump and Putin sitting in a tree. Friday of this week saw Donald Trump fawning over his authoritarian hero, international war criminal Vladimir Putin. The meeting was held at Joint Base Elmorf Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. Trump made sure Putin had a red carpet welcome, literal red carpet with flyover pageantry and a romantic ride together in the presidential limo before holding about a two and a half to threeh hour talk and a short no questions press appearance. The welcome was unusually warm for a dictator with an arrest warrant pending from the International Crime Court. The meeting resulted in no ceasefire or peace agreement. Trump stated that Zalinsky is set to join him in DC this next coming week to start talks from his side. The warrant issued for Putin's arrest was for the crime of abduction. He >> has no side. >> The warrant issued for Putin's arrest, Mom, this is important to you. Maybe it is to you too, Dad, because it's about children. His arrest was issued for the crime of abducting approximately 19,000 children from Ukraine. The UN Human Rights Office asserts that Putin has engaged in arbitrary executions of those children. >> The UN Human Rights Office asserts that Putin has engaged in arbitrary executions of the abducted children as well as sexual assaults. >> Mom, repeat that line. Say that again. What >> the thing that he is that he's got a warrant out for his arrest. >> All right. Say the last line. >> Who sent the war? >> Who said that? >> The International Criminal Court. >> There you are. >> Which I Who's in charge of that? >> I can't give you a name. Okay, fine. It's invalid. I have never heard that line that youated. I never heard that line. Do you think that children are getting abducted in Ukraine? >> I heard that in the news that they they did go and he >> about a year about a year ago. >> I did hear that. >> So because it happened a year ago, it doesn't mean anything. >> No, it does. >> Well, it never came up until now. >> No child. It's been in the news constantly. >> Child should be abducted. >> Uh just like the 300 >> You know what? I'm gonna I'm gonna cut through all the [ __ ] right here, right now. The nasty rotten egg in the barrel is Zalinski. He's going to give away everything the Russians took because he can't get it back. He did it under an agreement with Putin and and Trump that eventually they're going to give all that to the Soviet Union and he's going to go live in his rich little house that he built on the border with Poland. >> It is. He's he's made himself Zalinski has made himself a multi-billionaire >> and he did it with the help of the Russians. >> It is wild to me that you are >> Zillinski is Zalinski is 100% rotten to the [ __ ] core. >> It is crazy to me that you're going to sit here and vilify Zalinski. Meanwhile, Putin is literally committing >> crimes against humanity. >> Oh, who else is? Zalinski has Donald Trump. Donald Trump hadn't killed anybody >> against humanity. What's >> crimes against humanity? >> Humanity concentration camps. Concentration camps kidnapping American citizens off the [ __ ] street. Concentration camps. >> We basically have an SS happening at the White House. >> You got zero proof of any of this [ __ ] You're just blowing out of your own. >> You guys refuse to believe reality. You live in an alternate reality. You you you re you refuse to realize fact that the that the absolute devil in this whole thing is Zalinsky. >> Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. We're not talking about the border. Dad, >> you one of the things that you raised as a a point of why you think Zillinsky is bad is because he's become a billionaire. >> Yes. >> Trump is a billionaire and so is Putin. >> Yeah. But they already were. They didn't need to confiscate land and get rich. He's trying to get That's literally how Putin did it. He took over Russia. It's an oligarchy. All the money flows to him. >> [ __ ] >> You're so full of [ __ ] >> Let me ask you this. >> Did you guys fail history? I'm just curious. >> No. At least we took history. >> Did you? >> You don't even take it in your schools. >> What? There's no history lessons in Flower Mound, Texas. >> Like, you cannot possibly be this [ __ ] thick. Like, you just cannot be. Like you can't believe >> I can't believe I can't believe >> I can't believe what >> there are times where I think like it's a bit like you're just full of [ __ ] right? Like it's a bit >> of what? >> All of this. >> When you were saying crimes against humanity that Trump has done, >> he is saving those 300,000 kids that are over here. They're doing all kinds of grades right now. >> Mom, you know what? You're both going to apologize to me when this happens. Zalinski is going to give up every [ __ ] cent of ground that the that the Russians have taken. >> As soon as he does, and as soon as he does, I want an apology from both of you. >> And I want your $600 checks that are coming from Trump. Okay, go ahead. >> Can Can we stick to the [ __ ] topic here? >> That is the [ __ ] topic. [ __ ] topic is Bolinsky is a [ __ ] [ __ ] >> Who's Bolinsky? >> Whatever his [ __ ] name is. >> Okay. Trump ran on this promise. >> I don't want to hear anymore. All right, >> that's that this this part of the >> You're gonna hear it and you're gonna [ __ ] listen. Go. >> Nope. That's it. End of the podcast. We'll see you next week. Click. All right. Trump ran on a promise of ending the Ukraine war within 24 hours of being elected president. >> You know that didn't happen. So why do you keep bringing that up? But my question is over there being a peacemaker right now and trying to figure it out. I'd like to see any other president in the history of our United States over there trying to figure this out. >> Pull out a red carpet for a dictator. >> Hang on. As soon as I start going down a path of a question where you know you don't have a good answer for it, you lash out. I'd like to see any other answers. I have good answers. You don't listen. >> I want you both to be quiet and let me ask a question. >> Watch Matt. >> I want you I I know you're doing it the whole [ __ ] show. I want to ask you a question. I want you to say nothing while I'm asking the question. Once the final word of the question has been said by me, then I'd like you to answer it. Mom, >> got it. >> Okay, >> I'm ready. >> Trump ran on a promise of ending this war in Ukraine within 24 hours of being elected president. We are now 209 days into that term. The war is still going on and he just botched this peace talk. Do you think he broke that promise? >> He did not end the war in one day. He did not break. >> He did not end the war in 209 days. >> Yeah. He did not stop the war in one day because he has not botched this last meeting because of the meeting that he had with Putin. Now Zalinski is coming to DC on Monday. What? Nothing. >> What? >> And Putin. >> Say his name. It's Putin. >> Putin. >> Uhhuh. >> Yeah. >> I say it on my news channel. Putin. >> Okay. >> That's it. You're good. You're good. Go. >> So, because Trump was there and started >> with the team >> and start What? >> I'm so sorry. Please continue. because Trump was there and started the conversation. Now we're going to have another um Ukraine's coming Monday to DC. >> Okay, >> there's no way in one day he could stop the war. There's no way. Probably in one or two meetings, but he is trying hard. Give Trump credit where credit is due. You guys never do that. >> Give Biden credit where credit's due. You never do that. So, >> you don't roll out a red carpet for a [ __ ] dictator who is kidnapping and raping children. >> Oh, you don't? >> No, you don't. >> Wait, Dad. You think you should? >> No, I think it's been done by every president in the United States. >> I'd like to see where do you get this stuff that he's raping children? >> The International Criminal Court has a warrant out for his arrests for kidnapping, >> killing, and sexually assaulting these kids. These are crimes. >> All I know these are war crimes. They are crimes against humanity. >> All I know. All I know is you keep your hands off of this. >> 7,000 people. >> Yeah. You got it all [ __ ] up. >> A day. Oh my gosh. That Trump is trying to stop this war to help people. No, he's not. >> Yeah. Absolutely isn't. He's trying to win a Nobel Peace Prize. He thinks he's going to. >> Okay. >> He's a piece of [ __ ] move on to our second topic, martial law. This week, Trump invoked section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, the first rule in history uh or the first use in history, sorry, of that rule to declare a public safety emergency in Washington DC, allowing him to put the DC Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and deployed about 800 National Guard troops to the city as part of his quote safe and beautiful task force. Trump used the false claim that violent crime in DC was out of control to justify the move. >> Is he gone? Yes. >> To justify the move, despite the actual fact that violent crime in DC is currently sitting at a 30-year low with decreases in homicides, robberies, and carjackings, Trump cited other cities, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Baltimore, Oakland, as candidates for similar similar federal intervention. Yet, all except LA have seen significant decreases in shooting deaths and injuries this year. LA saw a recent increase in fatal shootings, but still lower than 2021 levels. Dad. >> Yeah. >> Oh, he's not there. Where is he? What the [ __ ] is going on? Hello. >> He had to go to the bathroom. >> He's mad at me because I bled up the TV. >> Well, can you hear us? >> I can. >> All right. Mom, do you think the US military should be policing our cities? I think what Trump is doing is 100% A+. Just because the numbers aren't showing it doesn't mean that that city doesn't have crime. It has crime all over the place. People don't want to go there anymore. >> How many times have you been there? >> Encampments. Homeless encampments all over the place. >> How many times have you been to DC? >> Over the homeless people to get places. How many times have you [ __ ] laid eyes on DC in the last year? >> In the last times. Zero. >> Have I [ __ ] been there? >> Okay. >> Okay. And it's [ __ ] >> That makes you an expert. >> It's [ __ ] >> And you know what? >> That makes you a [ __ ] expert. >> More than you. More than >> You're very lucky that you didn't get >> I doubt that very much. >> You're very lucky that you didn't get carjacked or a crime committed upon you while you were there. live in some weird [ __ ] bubble where all of these cities all around are just like it's just crime and murder left and right. I have physically been to all of these cities and it's just simply not [ __ ] true. >> Why Why do other people on the news >> then? Why don't you pack up your [ __ ] and move to DC? >> Your news sources. Is that what you mean? >> You mean news, Max? >> No. Other podcasts I listen to, they believe the same thing. >> That's cuz you consume [ __ ] Oh, okay. Okay. >> You have no real life experience with this. Like >> just because the numbers are down doesn't mean there's not crime. What about big balls that got carjacked? Now, that wasn't true. >> That was true. >> He pushed his girlfriend in the car, told her to lock the doors. 10 thugs beat him up. >> Two of them uh knocked him unconscious. >> Dad. Dad, can you just leave the TV alone for the next 25 minutes and do this? >> No, because she's back. She's got it all messed up. >> Can you at least lean back so your ear isn't just the only thing we're seeing of you? >> You want me to try to fix it? >> No, I want you to stay away from it. >> There was no reason. No reason. >> Dad, I have to ask you some questions here. You're on a podcast literally right now. Can you not [ __ ] with the TV for 20 minutes, please? I'm begging you. >> Why don't you ask her that? Ask her what >> if she can quit [ __ ] with the TV for the next 20 minutes. >> She is talking to us. I'm gonna ask you this question. Did you hear any of the stuff I said about Trump federalizing the DC police? >> Yeah. >> Do you think it's a good idea? >> I'm all for it. >> Okay. Uh, do you see, Mom, any similarities between what is happening right now in DC and Nazi Germany with the Gestapo? >> No. what I see is going to happen. Our president is going to clean up DC. I hope he moves on to the other cities that are like this. >> He is giving homeless people two options. >> Well, that's going to be another topic. We're getting to that. >> But [ __ ] it. Let's just talk about it right now. He has criminalized being homeless. You can in quotes get help. Okay. Go ahead. Say say what you're going to say. Why would it be criminal criminalized to say, "Hey, we want to help you >> because they got to fill those forprofit prisons with somebody." >> They're not going to go to prison. If they say, >> if they want >> help, >> they will go into a program for like what? Alcoholism or drug addiction or therapy. They're going to get a help. >> Okay. So, let me paint this picture for you. Let me paint this picture for you. >> Don't touch it. Somebody is living on the street because they have some kind of mental health issue. All right? They are not capable of having a coherent conversation with somebody because they're off their meds or they have some undiagnosed condition. A cop is going to come up and be like, "Hey, we're [ __ ] doing a sweep of this homeless encampment. You got two choices, treatment or a shelter. Which one is it?" They're not on planet Earth because they have potentially schizophrenia or any number of of problems. They can't even answer the question. And so that cop's going to be like, "Well, jail for you." >> They throw that person in [ __ ] jail. The numbers go up for the the for-profit prison, whoever owns it, whatever giant mega corporation owns it, and their beds are full, so they get government subsidy. That's what this whole thing is about. >> That's the way you and Haley see it. >> That's literally how it works. >> Have you That is not how it works. >> They're going to >> That's your opinion of how it works. which is so [ __ ] tainted it's ridiculous. >> Okay, Mom. Mom, hang on. Mom, let me go down this path with you. They're going to offer the treatment and if you say no, you go to jail. How many homeless people do you think would refuse the treatment or the shelter? >> Not very many. They're all going to say yes, help me a place to live. >> Who do you think would say send me to jail? >> None. >> Okay, then why is that an option? Why is that also part of this? Why would they even put that in the >> mop the [ __ ] street? >> I have no idea. >> You know what else would get them off the street? >> Housing. Why aren't we just taking care of homeless people? >> Why are we criminalizing them? >> It's because it's Hey. Hey, smart girl. Why in the [ __ ] aren't we doing that? >> That's what they're doing. >> Because Donald Trump is a piece. >> You're not too damn bright for having seen it personally. >> I'm not bright. >> Yeah. Seen it personally. >> Stop. >> No. I we >> you haven't seen [ __ ] personally. We already told you the reason that is not happening. The reason they are not giving them housing is because Trump is getting >> polola from the people who own these prisons. >> I don't believe that. I do not believe that any way, shape, or form. They're helping the homeless. >> Get to our next topic then. Trump's money. This week, The New Yorker published an article by David D. Kirkpatre titled The Number: How Much Is Trump profiting Off the Presidency? In the article, Kirkpatre claims How do they know that >> when everything's held in a complete silent trust? >> In the article, Kirk Patrick claims >> I want to know who wrote that article. It's full of [ __ ] >> Quit yelling. >> I already said it was David D. Kirkpatrick. In the article, Patrick [ __ ] that guy is >> in the article, Kirkpatrick claims that his research revealed Trump and his family have collectively profited more than $3.4 4 billion across both of his presidential terms. Most of which, 2.37 billion, came from cryptocurrency related ventures, including Trump's memecoin that had a $320 million profit and Melania's memecoin, which had a $65 million profit. He also had 339.6 million financial ventures, hospitality, Mara logo, events, fundraising, 270.8 million, including $125 million profit bump linked to event fees rising when he became president. The second time around, uh, in media, he made 116 million from books, merchandise, and licensing deals, including all the [ __ ] you guys own, that hat you're wearing, >> he didn't trust. He doesn't know how much he made on any of that. So, you can blow all of this nonsense out your ass, >> Trump jet usage, legal fees via packs, made $277.7 million, and campaign. >> Oh, hell, I Chad. writes you a [ __ ] two paragraphs of all the kind of money he lost. >> And he just valid. It's just as valid as that crap you spewing. >> And he has funneled uh money. >> He has funneled. >> Wow. >> Be nice. Jesus Christ throwing out statistics that have no background at all. >> I'm [ __ ] tired of facts. He has funneled money from >> his campaign and his packs directly into >> tired of being told you're stupid. >> All right, mom. Do you still think that Trump has not made any money from being president? >> All presidents make money. I do believe he'll make money. Biden's made money. Everybody makes money. Money money. >> No, >> that's not true. Not like this. These other presidents, generally speaking, don't engage with their personal business while they're in office. Trump is is >> No, they do it secretly. They do it secretively or they do it in stock action trades. That kind of stuff. >> Do you think any president while in office has made $3 billion off the presidency? >> I don't know. >> Neither is Trump. >> Okay. Um I mean I I it'sounding to me. prove one [ __ ] red cent of any of that. >> I don't have to. It's in an article that's very >> You don't have to because it's in a [ __ ] article. Wolf, what if I write an article that says he lost $5 billion? >> If you can get it to be the front page of New Yorker magazine, I'll believe it. >> Shut up. You won't believe that either. >> Why you I will believe it if it's in the New Yorker. If you can write an article and get it in the New Yorker, >> I've seen enough of you >> of me or the New Yorker. >> Both. >> Okay. >> Oh my god. Because you quote them, you quote them as fact that makes you just as [ __ ] stupid. >> There there is a little bit of a rift in your belief systems here between you two. Dad, you ignore this and denounce it as fake. All of it. You don't believe any of it is real. Mom, you do believe the reporting is real, but you just think it's okay for a president to use the presidency to enrich himself to the tune of $3.4 billion. >> I think all presidents enrich themselves, whether it be books, whether it be stock trades that they get insider information about, whether they make pictures that look like kindergarten or first graders and sell for 20 to 25,000 each pop while on cocaine. I think even now that wasn't even a president, but that was a son of a president. >> Um, so they all they're kind of like, >> well, Obama made over $100 million and he was a [ __ ] poor ass kid from the Bronx or wherever. >> Okay, moving on. >> And you can't prove you can't prove that he made it or he didn't make it. >> Let's do a simmer down, please. >> All right, the simmer down this week is What book are you reading currently, Haley? >> Oh, funny. You did >> what? >> Bunny. >> What's Bunny? I don't know. >> Um, it's like a dark comedy kind of a horror. I just finished uh How to Be Eaten. Also kind of like a dark comedy. I don't know. That's where I'm at right now. Kind of like that's how I'm feeling. >> Got it. Got it. Okay. Mom, what are you reading? >> I'm reading no books. And you didn't get my simmer down. So, boohoo. >> What was it? >> ABC game. Animals. >> We already did one of those. Dad, what book are you reading? >> On animals. >> Dad doesn't read books because most of them are put out by bullshitters like you. >> Oh. Oh my god. Oh my god. You have a book. You know you do. The one that Chad gave you. >> You got Dionetics. I know. You got a copy of that. >> I bought you a Trump Bible. Dad, you're not reading Boon's book. How I made my first >> I am reading a new science of heaven by Robert Temple. highly recommend it. In this book, it lays out basically all the research that's been done in the past maybe 50 years on plasma physics and how plasma is essentially >> starting to be revealed as the fundamental building block of all physical reality and that it may in fact be conscious. >> Um, highly recommend it. It's very interesting. It it lays out a lot about like >> what this all might actually be. Could we not do my simmer down quick? >> Chad. Sure. >> Chad. Haley. Dad. >> Do we have to say animals of the >> Chad Haley? Dad. Me. A. >> A. Um. Ass. >> B. >> What? I thought this was animals. Oh, don. You mean a donkey. Is that what you did? >> Yeah. >> B. Uh, baboon. >> C. Cow. dog. >> Back to me. >> E. >> What's an E? Uh, I don't even know. What's an animal that starts with E? >> Oh, come on. >> Huh? >> Elephant. >> Elephant. That's just >> Jesus. >> Yeah, right. You are. >> All right. Flamingo. >> What? Goat. >> Hippopotonus. >> Uh, >> I'm on it today. >> Ibeck. Oo. Uh, I don't know. Jay, the [ __ ] >> How about that? >> Jaguar. >> Yeah, that was good. Thanks. >> Hello. >> K, Dad. >> Hey, >> K. >> I'm thinking kangaroo. >> Kitten. >> Oh. Oh, wow. >> Llama, I'm on it. >> Mastadon. >> I'm not on it. N. >> Yeah. >> N. >> This ain't even funny this time. An >> That's why I didn't want to do it. >> N. >> Oh my god. We're calling this. This is >> No, we're not. We're finishing. I'm not a quitter. An >> would be >> I don't know. Uh, N. What's an animal that's an N? >> Where's my friend cat when I need her? >> N. N. This is bad. Alexa, give me an animal that starts with the letter N. >> I know about a number of animals which begin with N, including Narwhal. Anal >> Narwhal. >> Nile crocodile. >> Narwhal. >> Narwhal. All right. Jesus, this is boring. >> Wait. L >> O >> octopus. Mom, you're P >> P. Uh, hippopotamus. No, P. Uh, corpus. >> What's Q? Cubert. Next. >> Runner. >> R. S. We know S. >> Who? >> Who do we know that starts with S? >> Mom, we have to move on. This is death. No, just what's your favorite animal? >> QRS. I'm Turtle. You >> uh Maybe we should. >> This is unbelievable. We have to continue. We've spent five minutes on this. >> We're moving on. >> I'm sorry. >> Uh >> I'm sorry. >> It was a thought. Ain't any waste more of a waste of time on some of your topics. >> Oh my god. >> Our next topic is Trump versus numbers. This week some numbers came out that Trump didn't like at all. US wholesale inflation jumped sharply in July with a 0.9% monthly increase, the largest in over three years driven largely by Trump's tariffs. Wholesale prices rose 3.3%. Core prices excluding food and grocery climbed 3.7. Vegetable prices soared 38.9% and home electronics jumped 5%. The July consumer price index showed a 3.1% increase in core inflation and the July jobs report revealed only 73,000 new jobs far below forecast. Trump lied about the data being rigged, calling it the biggest miscalculation. >> Discount recounts being assaulted in DC. >> What? >> New headline. >> Fake news. I don't believe it. >> Yeah. Is it on Newsmax? >> Yeah, it's on Newsmax. It's not real. Uh the 73,000 new jobs was >> You're about out of places to go to get your news, aren't you? >> 73,000 new jobs was far below forecast. Trump lied about the data then being rigged, calling it the biggest miscalculation in over 50 years. In reaction, Trump fired Erica McIntfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner, and replaced her with EJ Anton. She >> listened to Chad Orle >> and >> and replaced her with EJ Antonia, a Heritage Foundation economist and Trump loyalist who has called Social Security a Ponzi scheme. Mom, do you believe these numbers are real? >> You always ask me that. I have no idea. >> My answer is yes. >> I have no idea. How do I How do I say yes when I haven't researched it and Chad's just spewing it and I'm supposed to believe it? >> Because it's been widely reported on these numbers are coming from at I mean prior to what has just happened credible government agencies whose entire >> right there's a [ __ ] lie. >> Government agencies >> credible government agencies >> their entire purposes are to compile these pieces of data. >> Okay. Let's say I say yes. >> Yeah. Okay. >> Okay. >> So, if you believe the numbers are real, then my next question is, >> do you think it was right of Trump to fire the people who made these numbers and replace them with his loyalists who will just say whatever they want? Do Let me ask you this. Do you think >> that's not right? If that's true, that is not right. If it's true, >> it's absolutely right. >> Dad, you're all for the numbers don't matter at all. Just make up whatever you want. >> He doesn't care. He doesn't care. I'm >> I'm all for whatever Trump says. Okay. Um, Mom, my next question is the the person he put in charge of these numbers now has openly said Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. >> Do you believe it is a Ponzi scheme? >> No, I do not. And I've read articles about it and >> I believe it is now, but it shouldn't be. >> No, I've read articles about it. I don't think it is. I mean, I guess because dad and I live it and we get our check and everything's good, you know, >> and our check keeps getting bigger. >> And it does get bigger, which is weird. >> But the person that put >> He wants to cancel it. He is calling it a Ponzi scheme to get rid of it. >> Oh, really? >> No, he is not. He has said he will never get rid of Social Security. >> [ __ ] lie. >> He will never get rid of Social Security. >> That came out of your mouth is a [ __ ] lie. >> That's not a lie. The person that he put in charge of these numbers, >> EJ, >> does want to get rid of it. >> No. Everything I've read, that is not that is not true. >> He wants to get rid of all the fraud. >> He wants to get rid of the people that are collecting social security that should not the dead people, the people that are like 50 years old, that shouldn't have a check. >> Let me ask you this. How does a dead person collect social security? >> Exactly. How do they I don't >> I never took them off the [ __ ] rolls to begin with. That's >> how they cashing that check. >> What? >> What's happening to the money? >> It goes straight into an account. >> You have to when they can spend it however they want >> when someone >> if they're Wait a minute. Mom, wait a minute. Dad says they can spend it however they want. If a person is dead, I hate to break this to you. You can no longer spend money. Okay. But I hate to break >> Oh, but whoever controls the account can. >> Okay. >> Smarty ass. >> I hate to tell you this. When my mother died, I was on that account. >> You don't even know what you're talking about. >> I was on the account. >> Can I talk? >> Yeah. They they don't understand. >> I was on the account and the social security kept coming. >> Yeah. >> Until you present the death certificate and say, "Hey, they're no longer alive." Those checks keep coming. Now once it does get caught up and they figure out that person is deceased from other records around maybe that the government did see that the person has died then that money has to be paid back. >> Okay. >> So that can happen Chad in an account. >> It does happen. You just said the money has to be paid back. Well, but years. It can go on for years. >> And who's gonna pay it back? Who's who's going to pay it back? There's no if the person who died has no account account authorization anymore. And whoever had that bank account, spend it all and there's nobody to collect it from. Smart people. >> Then they throw you in jail. >> No, they don't. >> That's for homeless people only. >> They got to find They got to find you first. I don't think social security is a is a Ponzi scheme and I think it'll keep going and our government will find a way to keep it going. >> But the bigger question is this. Trump is gutting all of these agencies and replacing the heads of them. >> God damn >> with >> I mean that's that's widely reported accepted. He's destroyed US. >> What? >> FBI, CDC, like name a federal agency. >> Name one. >> And he's fired the person at the top to replace it with his own person. The FBI is a great example. Dad Cash Patel is now the head of the [ __ ] FBI. >> That's right. >> That's what I'm saying. >> [ __ ] perfect. >> Okay, let's move on to our final topic. Gavin Newsome's big win. And this week saw California Governor Gavin Newsome expertly troll Donald Trump multiple times, mimicking Trump's style of rambling all caps tweets >> with threats to expose secret information about Trump and demands for Trump to quote stand down now or California will counter strike. But Newsome's trolls were more >> California than just meant to get under Trump's skin. He proposed redrawing California's voting districts to target five Republican held House seats, potentially shifting California's delegation significantly in favor of Democrats and negating the five Republican seats that will likely be picked up in Texas due to their redistricting efforts. Mom, do you think Gavin Newsome won the troll war this week? >> Yes. >> Gavin Newsome is not winning anything. He's a loser. He's making Cal California go under. If you think he's a winner, look back on the fire situation. Look back on where was the water. Look back on what was it? The railroad situation. He's not a winner. Chad, >> can you look back at Donald Trump's 34 felonies and the fact that he sexually assaulted women then? >> Well, look back on that. Is he a winner of any of that? >> Is kissing Putin's ass. Does that make you >> convicted of any of that? >> He has literally been convicted of 34 felonies. No, he hasn't. >> Okay. Uh, I guess we're living in different worlds. Um, >> won the troll war. >> [ __ ] couldn't let dog catch it. >> All right. Haley, do you think he won the troll war? >> Yeah, 100%. >> Oh my god. The state of California doesn't even like him. Haley or Chad? >> Okay. Okay. >> What's What does that mean? The state of California. Am I part of that? Yes, you are. >> Okay. So, if I say I like >> Gavin Newsome really I don't really like him, but >> there you go. >> It's come to a point where it's it's very clear that Republicans are [ __ ] they're dirty. Everything's dirty and Democrats are now going to have to get equally as dirty. Politics is [ __ ] anyway. So, like I'm here. >> The Democrats haven't been dirty for 40 years. You're so >> they just laid down and died through this whole thing. >> You are so full of [ __ ] It's ridiculous. >> Rolled over and laid down and [ __ ] gone past your eyeballs. >> And it was all of the Dems in Texas walking away so they couldn't [ __ ] redistrict. That was like bravo. I'm glad. Um they're all, you know, being threatened with being arrested and fined and all this [ __ ] So like that was kind of a baby step. Now Gavin Newsome is like, "Fuck it. We're gonna we're gonna redistrict, too." And I hope it's every blue state. I hope it's every Democrat because you cannot win this fight fairly anymore. >> It is it is 100% rigged. We know the elections. I'm terrified that we're never going to have an election again. Like, it's just [ __ ] rigged. Well, I'm not >> I do think Musk and Teal and all the people like these giant companies that have access to every computer in the United States >> companies again. >> Dad, do you know what Palunteer is? >> Yes, I do. >> What is it? >> Well, that's what you've been talking about. That group that's >> got Musk behind them. >> Nope. Try again. Do you know what it is? Yeah. You think all the big power mongers are running in charge? >> What is Palunteer? >> I don't know. >> Dad, >> what is what >> the like? >> What is Palunteer? >> We don't know. Tell >> So I'm using this to illustrate. You're yelling at us about we don't know [ __ ] We don't know [ __ ] The biggest the company that has the most influence right now over the American government. >> Who runs it? >> What's that? Who runs it? >> He has told Peter Teal. >> Who? >> Peter Teal. >> Okay. >> Oh, what's he got to do with the price eggs? >> He's a crazy megalomaniac billionaire. Friends with Elon Musk. He co-founded PayPal with Musk and now he runs this AI company called Palunteer. Their software is in basically every computer in the United States government. They use their AI software to target. >> He told me his story. >> Yeah. >> Okay. So my question, >> that's why I ignore That's why I ignore knowing who it is. >> Okay, stop. >> Okay, Dad. >> Because it came from your information sources. >> It's not my information sources. Palunteer is a real company that does exist. It is run by the people I'm talking about. >> I don't think they understand like how powerful this is like tech and AI. They don't quite get >> like you guys don't know for instance that Meta is collecting data from apps like Flow which is where women track their periods to know if women are fertile to know if women can give birth. You don't know that. And then you see things like Pete. >> Yeah. Well, you need to wake the [ __ ] up because it matters. >> All I know, all I know is I want quiet and let me [ __ ] finish [Music] from Twitter about a white nationalist pastor >> who is calling women [ __ ] incubators that our job and duty is to give birth. And then you have apps that are being tracked of women who are fertile and who can give birth. This is handmaid's tail [ __ ] >> So it's not [ __ ] funny. And yeah, you should wake up because I have a uterus and you have two granddaughters who are [ __ ] part of this. It's not funny. >> It's funny. >> You need to wake the [ __ ] up. >> Dad, why are you laughing at it? Why you laughing at that, Dad? because she she's talking about some segment of the population that's so small it isn't going to matter >> 50%. >> You ain't 50% of the population. >> You don't think women are half the population? >> You don't give a [ __ ] >> Yeah, women are half the population. Half of those women are not of childbearing age. So blow the [ __ ] 50% out of your [ __ ] ass. Neither one of you can do [ __ ] math. Worst of [ __ ] >> There is no way. Doesn't matter what the percentage >> even if they are tracking all that they can't control it. >> Y'all don't you can't even [ __ ] do simple math. So there's no point. >> My right away [ __ ] point. >> They want to put me in a household where the man makes all the decisions. Where my [ __ ] worth is wrapped up in my uterus. That is what [ __ ] country you're living in and that you voted for and that you condone. >> No, it's not. >> And will continue to vote for. You're like way extreme to the way you're being a little silly. >> You're blind. >> Yeah. >> You You do not pay attention to the real [ __ ] news and what's really going on. >> You know what? We're old. We'll die. Then you cannot yell at us anymore. >> Then you can have all your fun doing all your [ __ ] telling everybody that 50% of the women control the vote, which they don't because half of your 50% can't even have kids. >> What is sad to me is that you don't care. You just said we'll just die and then you can't yell at us. There is a whole [ __ ] world that's gonna be left behind when you're gone. And part of that look >> my kids. >> I know. >> With people with people like you running it, it's going to look bad. >> And you see what's happening like you see it. >> Yeah. We're trying to stop >> and you choose to ignore it because you worship this. We choose to stop it. I think our country right now is being put in a very safe situation by our president. He is doing everything he said he would do. He's making our country safer. >> We're trying to stop your [ __ ] >> Nothing. >> Yeah, mom. You're saying >> we're trying to stop your [ __ ] >> You're saying he's making the country safer, but every week we see videos of people being kidnapped by masked men who don't identify themselves in the name of our US government. Hang on. But I see you're about to see something. Hang on. We also have just told you they're going to start rounding up homeless people and throwing them in jail. >> I can't prove any of this, but hang on. >> So, who is it safer for? >> Safer for me and mom. I know that. >> But at the cost of other innocent people rounded up and put in concentration camps. >> You're not innocent. You're guilty of something or you wouldn't be rounded up. >> I can't argue. Those are not concentration camps. that is a place that they go if they're not legal. >> You do the same [ __ ] lame point of view >> every [ __ ] week and none of it matters. It's all horseshit. There are reports coming out of Alligator Alcatraz that people there are being assaulted, sexually assaulted, withheld food, withheld medicine, >> pregnant women and children. >> They're all They're all criminals. >> I haven't read any of that. I haven't seen any of that. So, >> and they're all illegal aliens. Okay, we're not getting anywhere. >> Okay, well that wraps up this one. Uh, it got pretty heated. Thank you everyone for joining us. Again, if you want to send us a question, just record it in a one minute or shorter video format. Send it to the necessary conversation [email protected]. >> Before we go, it is our three-year anniversary. I do want to tell each and every one of you that I love you very much for doing this show with us, for at least >> showing up to this. Dad, you don't make much of an effort, but you are here. At least you you do allow the camera to be turned on. And I know that you have a very hard time uh even looking at us and staying engaged for more than like 45 seconds to just throw out some kind of [ __ ] you, you don't know [ __ ] But I hope that that can change as we continue to do this podcast. I hope that at some point you will re-engage with it. >> See how much smarter you get over the years. >> Uhhuh. All I'm asking is just to like not watch TV while you're doing this. I think that would help a lot. Can you >> help a lot if you wouldn't throw out a bunch of [ __ ] horseshit stats? >> Okay. Happy anniversary. This was the worst show we have ever done. I I don't even want to >> That's definitely not true. >> I don't want you to put it on. I really don't. >> It's got to go on. That's the show. >> No, it doesn't. >> It's got to go on. >> No, it doesn't. >> Yes, it does. >> I love you. >> You want me to scrap the whole show? >> No. >> I love you, Haley. >> I love you, >> Mom. Do you really want me to not put this out? has to be. It has to be a confrontation. >> A confrontation. >> Confrontation. >> I don't like this show. >> When they when they put out a bunch of statistics that don't mean [ __ ] >> I don't like this. >> But I mean, that was the conversation is these statistics are being >> And if I weren't here, you wouldn't have had a conversation. >> We've had it without you for two weeks. >> Yeah, but you haven't been throwing this kind of crap out. >> Yeah. We talk about the same stuff, statistics, whatever's in the news. That's the format of the show that we've been doing for three years now. >> Same for every episode. >> You just want to [ __ ] argue. Call somebody. >> I didn't want to argue. You [ __ ] started this. >> You've been arguing today, Bob. >> Anyway, I love you all very much. Dad, I'm glad that you're you're back despite your fiery attitude. I'm glad that your hip is healing up and everything. Mom, I love you and I thank you for doing this podcast. I know it takes its toll on you. And Haley, I love you as well. Um, >> mom, I love you. I love you, Chad. I love you. >> Very heartfelt. Thank you. >> I love everybody. And you both need to get a better place for your statistics. >> Than the US government. >> Than the US government. >> Okay. >> Oh god. >> Um, well, that wraps it up. We will potentially see you next week. Mom, I need you on camera to say if you want this episode to come out or not. Do what you got to do. People think we script it anyway. Script away. >> Okay, we'll do. See everybody next week.